Muscimol, found in the candy, is from hallucinogenic Amanita muscaria mushrooms.
See full article...
See full article...
Yep, and don't expect this congress and absolutely not this Supreme Court to even think about trying to regulate it.It's not a food product; it's classified as a supplement. Foods and drugs are regulated, supplements aren't, thanks to some heavy duty lobbying.
So, no mention of safety.A Company You Can Trust
Founded in 2016, our company has rapidly emerged as a seasoned player in the industry, boasting a deep understanding of its intricacies. Over the years, we’ve honed our expertise and cultivated an unparalleled knowledge of the market, enabling us to navigate its ever-evolving landscape with confidence. Our product lines have withstood the test of time, having been meticulously developed and rigorously tested, ensuring that they consistently deliver on their promises. With a track record of success and a commitment to innovation, we continue to set the standard for excellence, providing our customers with the reliability and quality they’ve come to expect from a company that truly knows the ins and outs of the industry.
You (and I) would be thinking, "Wow it's going to be so enlightened in the future!"On the other hand, if you had told me as a teen in '90s small town Georgia that one day I would be sitting in the waiting room of a pot shop reading about 'shroom chocolate recalls...
Joe: "I'm not only a tester, I'm also a client."CLIA-certified labs do not issue CoA's. The "CL" stands for 'Clinical Laboratory. You are correct - clinical labs are tightly and closely regulated (unless you're Theranos), but they specifically analyze clinical samples. Clinical samples are blood, urine, plasma, etc. samples from humans. They're not involved in or responsible for any type of product release testing.
Any company can issue a "CoA." Basically a company sets specifications for a product, and each manufactured batch is analyzed to see if it conforms to the specifications. The method used for a specific analysis can be an 'official' method by a standards organization (e.g., USP, AOAC, AOCS, etc.), or an 'in-house' method clearly described in an SOP.
The amount of oversight and auditing of labs issuing CoAs depends on the intended use of the product. Drugs manufactured for human use must be manufactured under GMP conditions, and the labs analyzing these products must function under GLP. GMP and GLP facilities are subject to surprise government inspections and audits. And with regulations come added expense.
As for 'supplements,' the overwhelming majority of manufacturers of 'supplements' are not going to incur the added expense of using a GLP-certified lab. Why would they? They're not regulated. I wouldn't be surprised to find that DiamondShruumz is using Joe's Analytical and Upholstery Cleaning Services.
Sounds like Jimson weedDiphenhydramine does the same sort of thing (warning recreational dosage is close to lethal. Don't try without extensive research). It was... Fucking. Insanity.
I was in the bathroom and a small bump grew on the wall and spiders started to crawl out of it and it was just a fact. Okay there are spiders there now. I then went into the living room and sat on the couch and a friend I hadn't seen in about twenty years walked into the room and we had a full conversation for a good minute. I blinked and they were gone. I couldn't remember who it was or what we talked about. Nothing about this was abnormal at all. I could not tell I was hallucinating. I could not tell that my consciousness was altered in any way. Nothing. It was reality. Period.
I have never experienced such absolutism with a psychedelic. Even when your brain is completely smeared across the universe, something inside you knows that things aren't supposed to be quite this way. It was not the case with diphenhydramine.
I suspect this recall was less than voluntary. There's now been several lab reports showing problems that have made the news. I'm guessing they realized that the FDA was getting close to having the paperwork ready for ordering a recall and tried essentially a "you can't fire me, I quit" maneuver as spin and damage control. If their hand hadn't been about to be forced, I bet they'd still be selling them. They haven't shown any concern for their customers up to this point, why would they start now?Blows my mind that a company poisons its customers and it's up to them to decide whether and when to issue a recall
On the other hand, if you had told me as a teen in '90s small town Georgia that one day I would be sitting in the waiting room of a pot shop reading about 'shroom chocolate recalls...
I bought dark chocolate from Aldi recently, because I wanted to see if could make homemade chocolate brazils. It came in a pack of five bars, and when I ate one I actually found it rather bitter, though I think it will go well melted around brazil nuts. I don't really eat any sweets these last few decades, so if I find something bitter it is fucking bitter. Chocolate by itself does need a bit of sugar, I think.
A friend of mine did a stint in the Peace Corps in Panama, and then went back to live in the region. One time when he was back stateside, he brought some indigenous cacao patties. They take the cacao beans and grind them into a brownish powder, and then mix it with sugar and press it into these circles the size of small cookies.
My friend wisely advised to eat them one small bite at a time. One or two small bites is all that you need, and one of those patties probably had as much cacao as...dozens of chocolate bars, I think, maybe more?
Raw cacao powder is bitter and needs the sugar. It is also caffeinated (and other theo- xanthines) as hell. Once you've had the real thing, you understand that cacao is a drug, and what we call "chocolate" is like CBD gummies, it's extracted from a "naughty" plant, but you're mostly getting the flavor and the vibes.
CLIA-certified labs do not issue CoA's. The "CL" stands for 'Clinical Laboratory. You are correct - clinical labs are tightly and closely regulated (unless you're Theranos), but they specifically analyze clinical samples. Clinical samples are blood, urine, plasma, etc. samples from humans. They're not involved in or responsible for any type of product release testing.
Any company can issue a "CoA." Basically a company sets specifications for a product, and each manufactured batch is analyzed to see if it conforms to the specifications. The method used for a specific analysis can be an 'official' method by a standards organization (e.g., USP, AOAC, AOCS, etc.), or an 'in-house' method clearly described in an SOP.
The amount of oversight and auditing of labs issuing CoAs depends on the intended use of the product. Drugs manufactured for human use must be manufactured under GMP conditions, and the labs analyzing these products must function under GLP. GMP and GLP facilities are subject to surprise government inspections and audits. And with regulations come added expense.
As for 'supplements,' the overwhelming majority of manufacturers of 'supplements' are not going to incur the added expense of using a GLP-certified lab. Why would they? They're not regulated. I wouldn't be surprised to find that DiamondShruumz is using Joe's Analytical and Upholstery Cleaning Services.
No one, no matter how inexperienced, could ever mix up amanita muscaria, with a large flat red cap with white dots, witn psylocibin mushrooms, that are much smaller, brown and conicalHoly crap! That's the infamous fly agaric mushroom. Not necessarily deadly, but definitely not a pleasant experience when eaten. Bet these guys were going around without an experienced mushroom hunter and picking mushrooms that look vaguely like Psilocybin mushrooms. Looks close enough, riiiight?!
It reads to me as the most copy-ass copy ever written. I've known professional copy writers, that's a lingo bingo checklist if I've ever seen one.Suspiciously sounding more AI generated or copied from other sources with every word. Throwing in something something synergy would also not be out of place.
The Fly Agaric and the Psilocybin look nothing alike! First image Psilocybin.Holy crap! That's the infamous fly agaric mushroom. Not necessarily deadly, but definitely not a pleasant experience when eaten. Bet these guys were going around without an experienced mushroom hunter and picking mushrooms that look vaguely like Psilocybin mushrooms. Looks close enough, riiiight?!
The Fly Agaric and the Psilocybin look nothing alike! First image Psilocybin.
Second image Fly Agaric
View attachment 84264View attachment 84265
Well at least it doesn't contain any chemicals.I don't hear people say that as much as I used to, but it always makes me chuckle when I do. Cobra venom is natural. Poison Ivy is natural. Magnitude 8 earthquakes are natural. The proof by contradiction seems pretty straightforward to me.
Right?!?You (and I) would be thinking, "Wow it's going to be so enlightened in the future!"
However........
Because I am 6-years old and I love chocolate and I love gummy bears. It is chocolate and wrapped in a childish package. No adult would make something like that if it was dangerous for me, right? Right?I'm confused about why you would be eating a Diamond Shruumz candy bar if you were just expecting some chocolate.
In the EU supplements are regulated as food, so must present a list of ingredients.It's not a food product; it's classified as a supplement. Foods and drugs are regulated, supplements aren't, thanks to some heavy duty lobbying.
I still remember "stealing" some raw cacao powder from my grandma when she was baking, and mixing it up with some butter on a spoon. Yum!A friend of mine did a stint in the Peace Corps in Panama, and then went back to live in the region. One time when he was back stateside, he brought some indigenous cacao patties. They take the cacao beans and grind them into a brownish powder, and then mix it with sugar and press it into these circles the size of small cookies.
My friend wisely advised to eat them one small bite at a time. One or two small bites is all that you need, and one of those patties probably had as much cacao as...dozens of chocolate bars, I think, maybe more?
Raw cacao powder is bitter and needs the sugar. It is also caffeinated (and other theo- xanthines) as hell. Once you've had the real thing, you understand that cacao is a drug, and what we call "chocolate" is like CBD gummies, it's extracted from a "naughty" plant, but you're mostly getting the flavor and the vibes.
I've been writing a novel about a young woman with schizophrenia and wanting to treat her illness with respect and realism. I'd be willing to try this to help understand her better.
You can thank Oren Hatch and the Mormon church backed supplement grift.They don't list the ingredients? Over in the other side of the world all food products have to list ingredients and nutritional information...
I have bipolar II and recently had a bought of missing enough medication for it to come through.Strong recommend against.
If you want to know, really know, what it's like to live with a mental illness, go take some Lithium. The anti-schiz drugs all do the same sort of thing: they make it so you're going through life wearing a rubber suit ten feet thick. Can't feel anything, except as pressure. They dampen everything hard so that reality is tolerable and tolerably real.
I had a schizophrenic roommate for a while (we all met in rehab, and as my wife and I got our shit together, we couldn't watch them be homeless) and it was enlightening. He knew the voices in his head weren't real, but he still talked to them frequently. One of my most vivid memories of him was him doing the dishes and arguing with the voices: "Hey, go away, we're just doing the dishes." And he spent twenty minutes telling the voices in his head "no, you need to hold up, we've got dishes to do." Singing to himself, dancing a little bit.
But the dishes got done.
The good thing is that if you run out of pills, you can just lick your EV battery.I have bipolar II and recently had a bought of missing enough medication for it to come through.
Lithium carbonate is an indicator for bipolar because if you don't have it, then it does nothing, but if you do then it can stabilize your mood. These days, though, it's generally considered obsolete due to extremely dangerous side effects, but its low cost keeps it in use. (A 60-pill, 300mg supply at Walmart is $4 retail, but taking 1200mg a day wasn't uncommon when I took it as a middle schooler.)
It is literally lithium ore and mined out of the ground. Places that naturally have high lithium in their groundwater also have lower rates of crime, suicide and other sociological indicators of poor mental health.
i mean... you need to be very much legally blind to mistake one for another. below are comparison pictures (and it took me quite a while to find ones that do resemble each other a bit). let me repeat this again - they were adding other "medicinal" (as in not psychoactive but with dubious health benefit claims) mushrooms. most likely poor quality control of their sourcing for material that gets easily contaminated during production and storage ("boss this red mushroom fell into the container what should i do? eh, we are not wasting whole container of lion's mane, it's fine, ship it.") resulted in some amounts of unwanted chemicals in their confectionery. they tried to cover their asses by doing some amount of testing but the quality of them is questionable. i pointed this in previous article and Beth mentioned it now too. sadly the most likely shruumz will go under without any serious consequences and prophet belnds will just rebrand it to another product. supplements regulation is a joke, not only in usa but in other countries as well.Holy crap! That's the infamous fly agaric mushroom. Not necessarily deadly, but definitely not a pleasant experience when eaten. Bet these guys were going around without an experienced mushroom hunter and picking mushrooms that look vaguely like Psilocybin mushrooms. Looks close enough, riiiight?!
those products were not supposed to contain muscimol or any other psychoactive alcaloid found in mushrooms for that matter. those products were even tested for that. there is no "potency issues". so you know where you can stick your argument in.If you're experienced with these types of products you know not to eat the whole package at one time. There may be potency issues, but there are also failure to heed the label issues, too. This also happens with products bought at legitimate dispensaries.
the issue is the lack of regulation of supplements. there is no real information how often products were tested, how they were sampled etc. for what we know they might have been tested once, or multiple times until the results were satisfactory... so all that was done seem to be mostly voluntary tests by the brand company.As the article notes, previous COAs showed undetectable levels of muscimol. If those COAs were from CLIA-certfied labs, they're accurate or those labs are in deeper shit than any mushroom could dream of: CLIA is overseen by CMS, and if the Jaws theme isn't playing in your head at that acronym, then you don't work in medicine.
So I'm going to take the word of CLIA-certified lab COAs and whatever government lab found 4-Aco-DMT in these candies, over the word of executives desperate for a regulatory violation because the CSA is one of the few criminal laws less friendly to defendants than regulatory law.
You would have to chew it. Probably easier just to nibble on your phone.The good thing is that if you run out of pills, you can just lick your EV battery.
And ruin some company's plans for introducing "artisanal arsenic virile enhancement chocolate supplement bar"? No thanks! /sHere's my idea for a new regulation:
If you add it to food, it's a food, and should be regulated as such.
Cobra venon and Poison ivy are complex molecules with complex effects.I don't hear people say that as much as I used to, but it always makes me chuckle when I do. Cobra venom is natural. Poison Ivy is natural. Magnitude 8 earthquakes are natural. The proof by contradiction seems pretty straightforward to me.