Release the Kraken (Benchmark) - post your results

Jump to latest Follow Reply
fitten

fitten

Ars Legatus Legionis
52,250
Subscriptor++
  • #481
    hansmuff said:
    And that's when you know your precious high-end is getting beat:

    ===============================================
    RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
    -----------------------------------------------
    Total: 469.2ms +/- 9.2%

    (Ryzen 5950X on latest Chrome.)

    That tells me I have to upgrade in 2 or so years. Thanks for the heads-up ;)
    Click to expand...

    Here's my Geekbench 6 for the machine that is being replaced: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/4321061

    And the 12100 system: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/4316086

    I was looking at stuff and realized that the 12100 system had defaulted to DDR4-2400! (I had bought the cheapest, which was DDR4-3600). So I changed that and reran. I also think I saw somewhere where it was limited to 75W (Intel website says 89W max) but I'm not going to worry about that. The memory change has the single threaded benchmark roughly the same but it got a little boost on the multithreaded side.

    ASRock B760M-HDV/M.2 D4 - Geekbench

    Benchmark results for an ASRock B760M-HDV/M.2 D4 with an Intel Core i3-12100 processor.
    browser.geekbench.com

    I ran it on my 10700K system (stock speeds) and had a little chuckle... the 12100 beats it pretty well at single threaded and even beats it a little at multithreaded... but I also have a bunch of stuff running on the 10700K... nothing major but stuff like Skype, Discord, and some things that might cause a little bit of perf drop. It's also running Win11 rather than Linux.

    Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7C80 - Geekbench

    Benchmark results for a Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7C80 with an Intel Core i7-10700K processor.
    browser.geekbench.com

    I'm planning on upgrading the Win11 machine maybe this year after the new stuff comes out (end of year, early next year) if it's a good boost like rumors say.

    You should score a bit higher in that, at least the multi-core stuff ;)
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: hansmuff
    R

    roccovw

    Seniorius Lurkius
    33
  • #483
    ===============================================
    RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
    -----------------------------------------------
    Total: 339.6ms +/- 1.7%
    -----------------------------------------------

    ai: 33.5ms +/- 12.7%
    astar: 33.5ms +/- 12.7%

    audio: 81.9ms +/- 2.6%
    beat-detection: 18.4ms +/- 3.8%
    dft: 27.9ms +/- 3.9%
    fft: 14.1ms +/- 6.5%
    oscillator: 21.5ms +/- 1.8%

    imaging: 127.5ms +/- 0.5%
    gaussian-blur: 48.1ms +/- 0.5%
    darkroom: 57.9ms +/- 0.7%
    desaturate: 21.5ms +/- 1.8%

    json: 19.6ms +/- 2.5%
    parse-financial: 8.8ms +/- 3.4%
    stringify-tinderbox: 10.8ms +/- 2.8%

    stanford: 77.1ms +/- 4.3%
    crypto-aes: 19.9ms +/- 2.0%
    crypto-ccm: 24.5ms +/- 1.5%
    crypto-pbkdf2: 22.9ms +/- 13.4%
    crypto-sha256-iterative: 9.8ms +/- 3.1%

    14700KF
    TUF 4070 OC
    MS Edge
     
    H

    hal_incandenza

    Ars Centurion
    328
  • #484
    ===============================================
    RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
    -----------------------------------------------
    Total: 594.9ms +/- 6.8%
    -----------------------------------------------

    ai: 64.1ms +/- 22.4%
    astar: 64.1ms +/- 22.4%

    audio: 170.0ms +/- 6.3%
    beat-detection: 48.2ms +/- 4.4%
    dft: 39.4ms +/- 6.3%
    fft: 40.4ms +/- 4.0%
    oscillator: 42.0ms +/- 23.8%

    imaging: 205.1ms +/- 8.3%
    gaussian-blur: 69.8ms +/- 4.5%
    darkroom: 66.8ms +/- 1.1%
    desaturate: 68.5ms +/- 26.2%

    json: 33.6ms +/- 25.3%
    parse-financial: 18.0ms +/- 41.6%
    stringify-tinderbox: 15.6ms +/- 20.3%

    stanford: 122.1ms +/- 17.2%
    crypto-aes: 36.1ms +/- 17.0%
    crypto-ccm: 26.2ms +/- 18.6%
    crypto-pbkdf2: 39.2ms +/- 19.2%
    crypto-sha256-iterative: 20.6ms +/- 46.5%

    i5-13400
    GTX 1650 Super
    Firefox
     
    H

    hal_incandenza

    Ars Centurion
    328
  • #485
    ===============================================
    RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
    -----------------------------------------------
    Total: 330.7ms +/- 0.4%
    -----------------------------------------------

    ai: 29.4ms +/- 1.3%
    astar: 29.4ms +/- 1.3%

    audio: 80.6ms +/- 1.3%
    beat-detection: 17.8ms +/- 1.7%
    dft: 26.6ms +/- 2.6%
    fft: 13.9ms +/- 2.9%
    oscillator: 22.3ms +/- 1.5%

    imaging: 125.0ms +/- 0.7%
    gaussian-blur: 47.7ms +/- 1.0%
    darkroom: 57.9ms +/- 0.7%
    desaturate: 19.4ms +/- 1.9%

    json: 20.0ms +/- 1.7%
    parse-financial: 8.8ms +/- 3.4%
    stringify-tinderbox: 11.2ms +/- 2.7%

    stanford: 75.7ms +/- 1.4%
    crypto-aes: 19.7ms +/- 3.8%
    crypto-ccm: 24.7ms +/- 1.4%
    crypto-pbkdf2: 21.8ms +/- 1.4%
    crypto-sha256-iterative: 9.5ms +/- 4.0%

    i7-14700K
    integrated graphics
    MS Edge
     
    • Like
    Reactions: owdi
    C

    Claropus

    Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
    112
  • #486
    Total: 510.1ms +/- 2.5%
    -----------------------------------------------

    ai: 139.0ms +/- 9.4%
    astar: 139.0ms +/- 9.4%

    audio: 140.4ms +/- 0.7%
    beat-detection: 36.4ms +/- 1.0%
    dft: 41.0ms +/- 1.4%
    fft: 24.8ms +/- 2.3%
    oscillator: 38.2ms +/- 0.8%

    imaging: 115.6ms +/- 1.3%
    gaussian-blur: 39.5ms +/- 3.5%
    darkroom: 39.9ms +/- 0.6%
    desaturate: 36.2ms +/- 1.2%

    json: 22.0ms +/- 2.2%
    parse-financial: 11.0ms +/- 3.1%
    stringify-tinderbox: 11.0ms +/- 4.3%

    stanford: 93.1ms +/- 1.3%
    crypto-aes: 28.8ms +/- 1.6%
    crypto-ccm: 21.1ms +/- 3.0%
    crypto-pbkdf2: 30.5ms +/- 1.7%
    crypto-sha256-iterative: 12.7ms +/- 2.7%

    iPad Mini
    A15b @ 2.9GHz
    stock Safari
     
    C

    Claropus

    Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
    112
  • #487
    SuperDave said:
    That's....impressive. I'm sure it's already been discussed, but is it Safari or is it the M1?
    Click to expand...
    Apologies for replying a couple years late – I was kinda having fun going through the history (never really looked at this thread before). This may or may not be accurate, or not still accurate, but I recall reading about the unfair advantage Safari has. On Mac and iThings, it runs the JS engine in EL1, which assume means it can bypass MMU paging to get better performance. On iOS, all the browsers are/were required to use WebKit, and I think they all use the JS engine, but they call it at EL0: only Safari can use it at EL1. I could be completely off base on all this, but testing Windows Safari (if it is still around) might be illuminating.
     
    T

    teleos

    Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
    333
  • #488
    Claropus said:
    Apologies for replying a couple years late – I was kinda having fun going through the history (never really looked at this thread before). This may or may not be accurate, or not still accurate, but I recall reading about the unfair advantage Safari has. On Mac and iThings, it runs the JS engine in EL1, which assume means it can bypass MMU paging to get better performance. On iOS, all the browsers are/were required to use WebKit, and I think they all use the JS engine, but they call it at EL0: only Safari can use it at EL1. I could be completely off base on all this, but testing Windows Safari (if it is still around) might be illuminating.
    Click to expand...
    Do you have a reference to this? This is the first time that I've heard that a JS engine runs in privileged mode.
     
    C

    Claropus

    Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
    112
  • #489
    teleos said:
    Do you have a reference to this?
    Click to expand...

    Thank you for calling me out.

    I do apologize for posting incorrect information.

    It appears that I heard a thing many years ago and transformed it in my head to a different thing. The engine that Safari was using did JITC and had a right to mark pages as executable (otherwise, JITC would be pointless), but that feature was withheld from other iOS browsers for obvious security reasons. Apple has refined something and/or the other (probably tightened API constraints) to allow other browsers access to the JITC engine, so the issue no longer exists.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: teleos
    fitten

    fitten

    Ars Legatus Legionis
    52,250
    Subscriptor++
  • #492
    Upgraded my Linux box to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS...
    Homebrew Intel i3-12100, Asrock B760M-HDV/M.2 D4, 32GB DDR4 3200
    Ubuntu Linux 24.04 LTS, Chrome Version 124.0.6367.91 (Official Build) (64-bit)

    Code: 
    ===============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
-----------------------------------------------
Total:                        457.7ms +/- 1.3%
-----------------------------------------------

  ai:                          39.9ms +/- 3.0%
    astar:                     39.9ms +/- 3.0%

  audio:                      116.2ms +/- 3.6%
    beat-detection:            26.9ms +/- 5.7%
    dft:                       36.2ms +/- 3.5%
    fft:                       20.3ms +/- 2.4%
    oscillator:                32.8ms +/- 12.5%

  imaging:                    170.7ms +/- 0.4%
    gaussian-blur:             62.9ms +/- 0.6%
    darkroom:                  77.2ms +/- 0.6%
    desaturate:                30.6ms +/- 1.2%

  json:                        23.0ms +/- 1.5%
    parse-financial:            9.7ms +/- 3.6%
    stringify-tinderbox:       13.3ms +/- 2.6%

  stanford:                   107.9ms +/- 3.4%
    crypto-aes:                30.1ms +/- 5.1%
    crypto-ccm:                34.5ms +/- 5.1%
    crypto-pbkdf2:             29.9ms +/- 2.9%
    crypto-sha256-iterative:   13.4ms +/- 7.2%

    So pretty close to the original https://arstechnica.com/civis/threa...st-your-results.1189620/page-12#post-42488625
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: MadeInDex
    Made in Hurry

    Made in Hurry

    Ars Praefectus
    4,553
    Subscriptor
  • #493
    Garage computer. Mint 21.3 Cinnamon
    i5-2600 - Mozilla 125.0.2


    Code: 
    ===============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
-----------------------------------------------
Total:                       1481.6ms +/- 0.8%
-----------------------------------------------

  ai:                         174.7ms +/- 2.0%
    astar:                    174.7ms +/- 2.0%

  audio:                      515.9ms +/- 1.7%
    beat-detection:           130.2ms +/- 12.7%
    dft:                      152.6ms +/- 1.8%
    fft:                      111.5ms +/- 5.7%
    oscillator:               121.6ms +/- 11.4%

  imaging:                    491.9ms +/- 1.6%
    gaussian-blur:            182.6ms +/- 1.9%
    darkroom:                 138.8ms +/- 1.0%
    desaturate:               170.5ms +/- 3.6%

  json:                        55.5ms +/- 5.8%
    parse-financial:           28.6ms +/- 12.0%
    stringify-tinderbox:       26.9ms +/- 2.0%

  stanford:                   243.6ms +/- 2.2%
    crypto-aes:                70.5ms +/- 7.7%
    crypto-ccm:                49.8ms +/- 1.3%
    crypto-pbkdf2:             86.0ms +/- 2.0%
    crypto-sha256-iterative:   37.3ms +/- 2.6%
     
    • Like
    Reactions: owdi and MadeInDex
    A

    Aeonsim

    Ars Scholae Palatinae
    1,057
    Subscriptor++
  • #494
    Some odder/older hardware, running outdated versions of Firefox so not directly comparable but still interesting.

    Surface RT, Tegra 3 - FFX on Linux: 18423ms
    EeePC 901, Atom N270 - FFX on Linux: 16182ms
    Surface Book, i7-8650U - Windows Chrome: 848ms

    And for something more modern:
    AMD 5700X - Windows Chrome: 433ms
     
    • Like
    Reactions: owdi and Made in Hurry
    Made in Hurry

    Made in Hurry

    Ars Praefectus
    4,553
    Subscriptor
  • #495
    Chromium on the same box is much faster:

    i5-2600 vanilla, i am seriously impressed.

    Version 124.0.6367.118 (Official Build) for Linux Mint (64-bit)

    Code: 
    ===============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
-----------------------------------------------
Total:                       1203.3ms +/- 1.0%
-----------------------------------------------

  ai:                         119.3ms +/- 2.9%
    astar:                    119.3ms +/- 2.9%

  audio:                      338.5ms +/- 1.5%
    beat-detection:            71.4ms +/- 5.4%
    dft:                      153.9ms +/- 4.6%
    fft:                       50.5ms +/- 3.0%
    oscillator:                62.7ms +/- 1.6%

  imaging:                    452.0ms +/- 1.0%
    gaussian-blur:            165.1ms +/- 0.7%
    darkroom:                 202.4ms +/- 1.7%
    desaturate:                84.5ms +/- 1.4%

  json:                        58.6ms +/- 1.3%
    parse-financial:           30.2ms +/- 1.9%
    stringify-tinderbox:       28.4ms +/- 1.3%

  stanford:                   234.9ms +/- 2.8%
    crypto-aes:                61.6ms +/- 3.2%
    crypto-ccm:                74.7ms +/- 8.1%
    crypto-pbkdf2:             66.2ms +/- 3.1%
    crypto-sha256-iterative:   32.4ms +/- 3.5%
     
    A

    Aeonsim

    Ars Scholae Palatinae
    1,057
    Subscriptor++
  • #496
    Aeonsim said:
    Some odder/older hardware, running outdated versions of Firefox so not directly comparable but still interesting.

    EeePC 901, Atom N270 - FFX on Linux: 16182ms
    Click to expand...
    Switching to Chromium is about 12% faster for the EeePC.

    EeePC 901, Atom N270 - Chromium on Linux: 14400ms
     
    • Like
    Reactions: owdi and Made in Hurry
    J

    jwbaker

    Ars Praefectus
    4,904
  • #497
    roccovw said:
    ===============================================
    RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
    -----------------------------------------------
    Total: 339.6ms +/- 1.7%
    -----------------------------------------------

    ai: 33.5ms +/- 12.7%
    astar: 33.5ms +/- 12.7%

    audio: 81.9ms +/- 2.6%
    beat-detection: 18.4ms +/- 3.8%
    dft: 27.9ms +/- 3.9%
    fft: 14.1ms +/- 6.5%
    oscillator: 21.5ms +/- 1.8%

    imaging: 127.5ms +/- 0.5%
    gaussian-blur: 48.1ms +/- 0.5%
    darkroom: 57.9ms +/- 0.7%
    desaturate: 21.5ms +/- 1.8%

    json: 19.6ms +/- 2.5%
    parse-financial: 8.8ms +/- 3.4%
    stringify-tinderbox: 10.8ms +/- 2.8%

    stanford: 77.1ms +/- 4.3%
    crypto-aes: 19.9ms +/- 2.0%
    crypto-ccm: 24.5ms +/- 1.5%
    crypto-pbkdf2: 22.9ms +/- 13.4%
    crypto-sha256-iterative: 9.8ms +/- 3.1%

    14700KF
    TUF 4070 OC
    MS Edge
    Click to expand...
    Somewhat incredibly, I get this exact score, 339.6, on the same CPU with V8 12.6.0. It makes one wonder if there are quantization problems in Kraken.
     
    T

    thepropagandist

    Ars Scholae Palatinae
    669
  • #499
    1TB iPad Pro (M4), iPadOS 17.5
    ===============================================
    RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
    -----------------------------------------------
    Total: 319.4ms +/- 3.1%
    -----------------------------------------------

    ai: 87.1ms +/- 10.5%
    astar: 87.1ms +/- 10.5%

    audio: 88.5ms +/- 0.9%
    beat-detection: 23.2ms +/- 1.3%
    dft: 25.2ms +/- 1.8%
    fft: 16.0ms +/- 2.1%
    oscillator: 24.1ms +/- 1.7%

    imaging: 70.3ms +/- 2.1%
    gaussian-blur: 24.8ms +/- 1.8%
    darkroom: 21.5ms +/- 1.8%
    desaturate: 24.0ms +/- 4.2%

    json: 13.8ms +/- 3.3%
    parse-financial: 6.9ms +/- 3.3%
    stringify-tinderbox: 6.9ms +/- 3.3%

    stanford: 59.7ms +/- 1.4%
    crypto-aes: 18.8ms +/- 2.4%
    crypto-ccm: 14.0ms +/- 3.4%
    crypto-pbkdf2: 19.0ms +/- 0.0%
    crypto-sha256-iterative: 7.9ms +/- 2.9%
     
    J

    jwbaker

    Ars Praefectus
    4,904
  • #500
    thepropagandist said:
    1TB iPad Pro (M4), iPadOS 17.5
    ===============================================
    RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
    -----------------------------------------------
    Total: 319.4ms +/- 3.1%
    -----------------------------------------------

    ai: 87.1ms +/- 10.5%
    astar: 87.1ms +/- 10.5%

    audio: 88.5ms +/- 0.9%
    beat-detection: 23.2ms +/- 1.3%
    dft: 25.2ms +/- 1.8%
    fft: 16.0ms +/- 2.1%
    oscillator: 24.1ms +/- 1.7%

    imaging: 70.3ms +/- 2.1%
    gaussian-blur: 24.8ms +/- 1.8%
    darkroom: 21.5ms +/- 1.8%
    desaturate: 24.0ms +/- 4.2%

    json: 13.8ms +/- 3.3%
    parse-financial: 6.9ms +/- 3.3%
    stringify-tinderbox: 6.9ms +/- 3.3%

    stanford: 59.7ms +/- 1.4%
    crypto-aes: 18.8ms +/- 2.4%
    crypto-ccm: 14.0ms +/- 3.4%
    crypto-pbkdf2: 19.0ms +/- 0.0%
    crypto-sha256-iterative: 7.9ms +/- 2.9%
    Click to expand...
    These are pretty interesting because they are a mix of way worse and way better than results from an x86 CPU.
     
    yd

    yd

    Ars Legatus Legionis
    20,764
    Subscriptor++
  • #502
    Looks like its time for an upgrade - this is a 5850x 16 core chip with ddr4 3200mhz ram

    ===============================================
    RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
    -----------------------------------------------
    Total: 559.1ms +/- 1.3%
    -----------------------------------------------

    ai: 65.7ms +/- 4.9%
    astar: 65.7ms +/- 4.9%

    audio: 168.8ms +/- 2.0%
    beat-detection: 48.5ms +/- 2.3%
    dft: 36.7ms +/- 6.1%
    fft: 42.8ms +/- 4.8%
    oscillator: 40.8ms +/- 5.2%

    imaging: 193.2ms +/- 2.1%
    gaussian-blur: 62.0ms +/- 4.5%
    darkroom: 74.0ms +/- 1.6%
    desaturate: 57.2ms +/- 5.1%

    json: 28.5ms +/- 7.2%
    parse-financial: 14.6ms +/- 13.1%
    stringify-tinderbox: 13.9ms +/- 4.5%

    stanford: 102.9ms +/- 2.4%
    crypto-aes: 28.8ms +/- 3.3%
    crypto-ccm: 21.6ms +/- 5.7%
    crypto-pbkdf2: 37.2ms +/- 2.2%
    crypto-sha256-iterative: 15.3ms +/- 7.6%
     
    A

    A. Reed

    Ars Praetorian
    475
  • #503
    i9-13900k

    ===============================================
    RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
    -----------------------------------------------
    Total: 335.7ms +/- 0.4%
    -----------------------------------------------

    ai: 29.4ms +/- 4.2%
    astar: 29.4ms +/- 4.2%

    audio: 83.4ms +/- 0.8%
    beat-detection: 19.2ms +/- 2.4%
    dft: 26.9ms +/- 0.8%
    fft: 14.4ms +/- 2.6%
    oscillator: 22.9ms +/- 1.0%

    imaging: 130.8ms +/- 0.3%
    gaussian-blur: 48.1ms +/- 0.5%
    darkroom: 59.6ms +/- 0.6%
    desaturate: 23.1ms +/- 1.8%

    json: 17.4ms +/- 2.9%
    parse-financial: 7.2ms +/- 4.2%
    stringify-tinderbox: 10.2ms +/- 3.0%

    stanford: 74.7ms +/- 1.4%
    crypto-aes: 19.1ms +/- 2.8%
    crypto-ccm: 24.3ms +/- 1.4%
    crypto-pbkdf2: 21.8ms +/- 2.1%
    crypto-sha256-iterative: 9.5ms +/- 4.0%
     
    R

    RicDavis

    Ars Praefectus
    3,261
  • #504
    yd said:
    Looks like its time for an upgrade - this is a 5850x 16 core chip with ddr4 3200mhz ram

    ===============================================
    RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
    -----------------------------------------------
    Total: 559.1ms +/- 1.3%
    -----------------------------------------------
    Click to expand...
    Maybe a case of change browser or look at the hardware config. My lowly 5600g with 2666 RAM turns in 480 using the current release of Edge on Windows 11.
     
    Made in Hurry

    Made in Hurry

    Ars Praefectus
    4,553
    Subscriptor
  • #506
    Something different:

    Vivobook 12500H. Version 125.0.6422.141 (Official Build, ungoogled-chromium) (64-bit), Linux Mint 21.3

    Code: 
    ===============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
-----------------------------------------------
Total:                        462.9ms +/- 0.9%
-----------------------------------------------

  ai:                          38.1ms +/- 1.4%
    astar:                     38.1ms +/- 1.4%

  audio:                      118.4ms +/- 3.7%
    beat-detection:            30.0ms +/- 12.7%
    dft:                       36.2ms +/- 3.7%
    fft:                       21.7ms +/- 1.6%
    oscillator:                30.5ms +/- 1.7%

  imaging:                    172.8ms +/- 0.7%
    gaussian-blur:             63.0ms +/- 1.9%
    darkroom:                  80.2ms +/- 0.4%
    desaturate:                29.6ms +/- 1.7%

  json:                        28.0ms +/- 2.1%
    parse-financial:           13.4ms +/- 2.8%
    stringify-tinderbox:       14.6ms +/- 2.5%

  stanford:                   105.6ms +/- 0.8%
    crypto-aes:                25.8ms +/- 1.8%
    crypto-ccm:                36.2ms +/- 1.6%
    crypto-pbkdf2:             30.2ms +/- 1.0%
    crypto-sha256-iterative:   13.4ms +/- 2.8%
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.
    Jump to latest Follow Reply
    Jump to latest Follow Reply