Sprawling Russian Thread

Stern

Ars Praefectus
3,504
Subscriptor++
Now he comes begging and then getting kicked out of the room for daring to go in first. LOL Lavrov must be fucking seething.
He would be seething, but at his aides who didn't teach him about correct local protocol. The Russians are used to the most important people of the meeting entering last (also how it's done in e.g. Europe and the US). North Korea apparently does things the opposite way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Not_an_IT_guy
Armenia probably considered it existential. Without material backing of Russia, Armenia is quite literally at the mercy of Azerbaijan and Turkey. Them backing out should be considered huge klaxons for anyone that might have thought it could have been real.
The question is where they're headed. There were those joint US training drills earlier in the year, but that wasn't much. It's only a token showing until real hardware starts getting slung around. Azerbaijan wants "their" satellite territory no one recognizes. They want a land bridge to Turkey for a direct pipeline. Ankara wants that sweet, sweet Baku oil and a foil sitting right over the border from Iran. They also are rumored to not think positively of Armenia, no clue what that's about*. We start getting in on the game, you could see two NATO members fueling and funding both sides of a conflict.

*please tell me I don't need the /s
 

pauli

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,643
Moderator

An unnamed U.S. official told the Miami Herald that Russia had split up the flotilla and sent its nuclear submarine north to the Atlantic, and the rest of its warships south, where they are likely to dock in Venezuela.

No clear reason given. If the goal was to sneak the sub somewhere without anyone noticing, they, uh, aren't succeeding.


s5zwqdX.png


Subtle signaling by the US Navy, this is not.
 

Baenwort

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,470
Subscriptor++



No clear reason given. If the goal was to sneak the sub somewhere without anyone noticing, they, uh, aren't succeeding.


s5zwqdX.png


Subtle signaling by the US Navy, this is not.
This is why pilots practice drawing shapes on maps with their routes, right? ;)

Sure, it sometimes makes the news and someone gets a a finger wagged at them while their Admiral holds back a grin. But it is a tradition of the Cold War that it has paid off to keep around against the complaints.
 

ramases

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,569
Subscriptor++
This is why pilots practice drawing shapes on maps with their routes, right? ;)

Kind of disappointed I see no "Slawa Ukraini"-like flight path; I blame the decline of cursive writing required to write that (well, sans the dots) with an aircraft flight path. :p
 

goates

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,215
Subscriptor++
Kind of disappointed I see no "Slawa Ukraini"-like flight path; I blame the decline of cursive writing required to write that (well, sans the dots) with an aircraft flight path. :p
What about rewiring sonobuoys to play the Ukrainian national anthem and dropping them over the sub for its entire journey home?
 

ramases

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,569
Subscriptor++
What about rewiring sonobuoys to play the Ukrainian national anthem and dropping them over the sub for its entire journey home?

Perhaps mixed with "Elore budai sracok" (aka Pingitore's "Avanti ragazzi di Buda"/"Forward, youth of Buda" commemorating the Hungarian Revolution of 1956. Also, an example of stopped clocks being right occasionally, with both Orban and various right-wing Italian Ultras liking it), Karel Kryl's "Bratricku, zavirej vratka" ("Close the Gate, Litttle Brother", Prague Spring) and Shostakovich's #5 and #7 (the irony that Stalin initially thought them to be pro-Stalin is just too delicious).

It is a long way home.

Maybe throw in a couple readings of the Petrapavlovsk Resolution (the Kronstadt Rebellion's demands) in for good measure. Or "Hymn to Red October"; the movie is, after all, about a submarine defecting to the United States.
 

karolus

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,685
Subscriptor++
If Ukraine continues to have success damaging Russia’s petroleum industry, they will be in a world of economic hurt. That’s a significant part of their hard currency. Although they have other significant natural resources, none other will be as easy to convert to needed cash. Also, due to the aggression shown toward Ukraine, other European nations have wised up, and are moving towards alternative energy sources at an increasing clip—leaving dwindling opportunities to return to pre-war conditions. Russia’s largest nemesis at this point may not be military in nature—but the invisible hand—ironically hastened by their military blunders.
 
If Ukraine continues to have success damaging Russia’s petroleum industry, they will be in a world of economic hurt. That’s a significant part of their hard currency. Although they have other significant natural resources, none other will be as easy to convert to needed cash. Also, due to the aggression shown toward Ukraine, other European nations have wised up, and are moving towards alternative energy sources at an increasing clip—leaving dwindling opportunities to return to pre-war conditions. Russia’s largest nemesis at this point may not be military in nature—but the invisible hand—ironically hastened by their military blunders.
Unfortunately, Russia's main income is from crude, not refined products, and Ukraine has so far mainly limited itself to strikes on refineries, possibly to not increase oil prices and annoy the US. Perhaps after November...
 
  • Like
Reactions: karolus

Happysin

Ars Legatus Legionis
98,681
Subscriptor++
Unfortunately, Russia's main income is from crude, not refined products, and Ukraine has so far mainly limited itself to strikes on refineries, possibly to not increase oil prices and annoy the US. Perhaps after November...
Hitting the refineries directly impacts Russia's ability to fuel its war machine. If Russia were buying refined fuel on the open market, they either couldn't get enough, or it would pauper them at whatever above-retail prices the could get it at. Since they have to jump through hoops right now to get revenue from crude, it's very likely the refineries are the much better (literal) bang for the buck when it comes to the war effort.
 

uno2tres

Ars Scholae Palatinae
964
Hitting the refineries directly impacts Russia's ability to fuel its war machine. If Russia were buying refined fuel on the open market, they either couldn't get enough, or it would pauper them at whatever above-retail prices the could get it at. Since they have to jump through hoops right now to get revenue from crude, it's very likely the refineries are the much better (literal) bang for the buck when it comes to the war effort.
Plus refineries are much more complex than wells, pipelines, and terminals. Even without the war and sanctions they would be more expensive and time consuming to repair, and with sanctions at a minimum repairing them occupies limited advanced industrial capacity.
 

Happysin

Ars Legatus Legionis
98,681
Subscriptor++
Plus refineries are much more complex than wells, pipelines, and terminals. Even without the war and sanctions they would be more expensive and time consuming to repair, and with sanctions at a minimum repairing them occupies limited advanced industrial capacity.
That's a very good point. Most of the expertise that came for building those was from a Chevron contract, if I recall. Which means those people are not available to Russia at an price with the sanctions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bjn

papadage

Ars Legatus Legionis
41,732
Subscriptor++
Russia came up in one of my business negotiations the other day. As a matter of policy, my company will not provide any software, data, or services to any person or entity in Russia. This is beyond the sanctions requirements. The explanation is that it simplifies compliance with sanctions that other countries have slightly different from those of the US.

Any large multinational probably does the same to prevent inadvertent violation of some sanctions law somewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bardon

Happysin

Ars Legatus Legionis
98,681
Subscriptor++
Any large multinational probably does the same to prevent inadvertent violation of some sanctions law somewhere.
I can say with 100% confidence that oil and gas companies are not the kind to be shy from working with places where they have to be careful with sanctions. (One of my global construction clients also did blanket bans for simplicity as well.)

But that is a clear "falls under sanctions" wall as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tesseract4

Shavano

Ars Legatus Legionis
59,253
Subscriptor

uno2tres

Ars Scholae Palatinae
964
If Russia wants to talk to the US about their plans to demine southeastern Ukraine and withdraw to within internationally recognized borders, sure. If it's anything else, what's to talk about?
Reinterpreting the succession of treaty privileges and obligations following collapse of the Soviet Union, such that all former constituents, including Ukraine, share the UNSC permanent seat accorded to the USSR (as well as sharing commitments under arms control treaties and whatnot)
 

Happysin

Ars Legatus Legionis
98,681
Subscriptor++
Reinterpreting the succession of treaty privileges and obligations following collapse of the Soviet Union, such that all former constituents, including Ukraine, share the UNSC permanent seat accorded to the USSR (as well as sharing commitments under arms control treaties and whatnot)
I have argued from nearly the beginning of the the Ukraine war that one of the other Security Council members should pressure China in to formally recognizing Ukraine as the inheritor of the Security Council seat the USSR held. Why China? Because structurally, the CCP holds a position far closer to Ukraine's government than Russia's when it comes to who inherited what from the old empires, and the US could otherwise trivially assert that the government of Taiwan are the real signatories that deserve to be on the Security Council.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SuinusLatinus
I have argued from nearly the beginning of the the Ukraine war that one of the other Security Council members should pressure China in to formally recognizing Ukraine as the inheritor of the Security Council seat the USSR held. Why China? Because structurally, the CCP holds a position far closer to Ukraine's government than Russia's when it comes to who inherited what from the old empires, and the US could otherwise trivially assert that the government of Taiwan are the real signatories that deserve to be on the Security Council.
Not seen that argument before but it’s an interesting one. Any more links, either to yourself or other articles arguing Ukraine should hold Russia’s UN seat, and that China should support them?
 

Happysin

Ars Legatus Legionis
98,681
Subscriptor++
Not seen that argument before but it’s an interesting one. Any more links, either to yourself or other articles arguing Ukraine should hold Russia’s UN seat, and that China should support them?
You can find opinion pieces arguing for it as well: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/04/07/russia-ukraine-united-nations-zelensky-right/

There's more saying Russia should just be booted. Some of those use the same logic, that Russia is not the Soviet Union, as as such, they could be removed.
 
You can find opinion pieces arguing for it as well: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/04/07/russia-ukraine-united-nations-zelensky-right/

There's more saying Russia should just be booted. Some of those use the same logic, that Russia is not the Soviet Union, as as such, they could be removed.
Thanks, paywalled but I can see the title, which is enough.

Would be interesting to see Taiwan inform China that unless China starts applying the CCP’s position to Ukraine and begins advocating for Ukraine to take the seat, Taiwan will adopt Russia’s position and themselves apply for China’s UN seat.

I presume Taiwan itself has little to no interest in actually applying for a UN SC seat. - this would more be a way of Taiwan embarrassing China and supporting Ukraine.

One of the wilder interpretations of international law, but stranger things have happened.

Realistically, China won’t go for it. They really don’t want another G7 seat going to the EU. Also Taiwan doesn’t want to play silly games with their own future or poke the bear (or provoke a backlash from a possible President Trump).
 

Shavano

Ars Legatus Legionis
59,253
Subscriptor
I have argued from nearly the beginning of the the Ukraine war that one of the other Security Council members should pressure China in to formally recognizing Ukraine as the inheritor of the Security Council seat the USSR held. Why China? Because structurally, the CCP holds a position far closer to Ukraine's government than Russia's when it comes to who inherited what from the old empires, and the US could otherwise trivially assert that the government of Taiwan are the real signatories that deserve to be on the Security Council.
Doesn't sound likely with China backing Russia's position on the war and depending on them for oil.
 
Russia and China vote together quite a lot on the UNSC. The idea that they would support handing Russia's vote to Ukraine is a silly fantasy, no matter how you tried to tie it to Taiwan. You're not going to logic and law someone into taking action against their own interests in international law. You just aren't.
 

Happysin

Ars Legatus Legionis
98,681
Subscriptor++
Russia and China vote together quite a lot on the UNSC. The idea that they would support handing Russia's vote to Ukraine is a silly fantasy, no matter how you tried to tie it to Taiwan. You're not going to logic and law someone into taking action against their own interests in international law. You just aren't.
I see it as quite the opposite, actually. If you were to get the larger UN assembly to agree to the tactic*, you have a powerful chunk of Realpolitik to use against the PRC. Support Ukraine as the heir to the USSR's seat on the Council, or lose face by losing yours as invalid for the same reason.

That said, I don't think the West (and specifically the US) is willing to play that hard, but the process of divestment and de-globalization going on right now at least makes it a practical threat for the future.


*Big "if", of course. But the shine has come off China's efforts to buy favor with poorer nations, and I don't think they would be quite so quick to back China on such a power play.
 
Plus refineries are much more complex than wells, pipelines, and terminals. Even without the war and sanctions they would be more expensive and time consuming to repair, and with sanctions at a minimum repairing them occupies limited advanced industrial capacity.
You're also hitting a refinery, which burns once. Hit a well and it burns until you cap it, and you start getting hellish pictures like Desert Storm. Bad PR -- "Look at what Ukraine is doing to the environment! What barbarians!" Not that you won't already, it's just easier to fend them away when a cracking tower goes poof.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tesseract4

pauli

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,643
Moderator

Article about the interrelation of war and domestic crime - war does lower crime, for a while. On the other hand, it turns out that recruiting and ultimately releasing people who were in prison for a reason has consequences.

The return of Wagner recruits to Russia has proved a shock to residents of cities and villages who discover men they thought were serving long jail terms living among them. People convicted of murder, and even cannibalism, have been among those pardoned.
Delightful. Also, something that hasn't been mentioned - they're short on cops, at a time when they just might be useful.

Police numbers have also fallen in many regions, suggesting fewer were available to solve crimes, as people abandoned poorly paid jobs for more lucrative military service.
 

Article about the interrelation of war and domestic crime - war does lower crime, for a while. On the other hand, it turns out that recruiting and ultimately releasing people who were in prison for a reason has consequences.


Delightful. Also, something that hasn't been mentioned - they're short on cops, at a time when they just might be useful.
Have the cannibals do the policing.
 

pauli

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,643
Moderator

Russian President Vladimir Putin is reported to have replaced an official within his Federal Security Service (FSB) who laid the groundwork for his country's full-scale invasion of neighboring Ukraine.

Sergei Beseda, 70, who served as head of the Federal Security Service's (FSB) fifth directorate, has been replaced by Alexei Komkov, who formerly worked as deputy head of the spy agency, Russian investigative news website Important Stories reported on Saturday, citing two sources.

Internal FSB factional politics, though taking over two years to push out an incompetent old man seems... uncharacteristic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bardon
Maybe he'll have a nice visit over tea? Receive some new undies? I'd avoid doorknobs and bridges.
So, things to avoid in Russia to live a long life:
  • doorknobs
  • bridges and other high places
  • windows
  • airplanes
  • tea
  • underwear
  • special agents
  • cars
  • drones
  • ex-soldiers/-prisoners
  • gulags
  • politics, especially opposition politics
  • toxins
  • fires
  • cigarettes
  • factories producing military goods
  • flagships on the Black Sea
  • moving abroad in an attempt to avoid everything else on the list after getting on Putin's personal shitlist

Anything else?
 
So, things to avoid in Russia to live a long life:
  • doorknobs
  • bridges and other high places
  • windows
  • airplanes
  • tea
  • underwear
  • special agents
  • cars
  • drones
  • ex-soldiers/-prisoners
  • gulags
  • politics, especially opposition politics
  • toxins
  • fires
  • cigarettes
  • factories producing military goods
  • flagships on the Black Sea
  • moving abroad in an attempt to avoid everything else on the list after getting on Putin's personal shitlist

Anything else?
Ice picks and snuff boxes.