I'm now dual booting Debian 9.0 (Stretch) and Windows 8.1
I'm now dual booting Debian 9.0 (Stretch) and Windows 8.1
Oh, my... why are you torturing yourself with 8.1 vs. moving up to 10?
I'm now dual booting Debian 9.0 (Stretch) and Windows 8.1
Oh, my... why are you torturing yourself with 8.1 vs. moving up to 10?
Having 8.1 can be quite embarrassing these days, but I guess I just never get the urge to buy 10. Save a few bucks in the process though
I'm now dual booting Debian 9.0 (Stretch) and Windows 8.1
Oh, my... why are you torturing yourself with 8.1 vs. moving up to 10?
Having 8.1 can be quite embarrassing these days, but I guess I just never get the urge to buy 10. Save a few bucks in the process though
Windows 10 was a free upgrade until July 2016. You might even still be able to do so (according to some random articles online).
I like i3wm a lot, but there are some problems:
1. Get the idea out of your head that you won't also need something like Gnome installed. There's too much useful software there, so you generally have it installed anyway.
2. There's a ton of messing with configuration to get things just right. It's amazingly flexible, but aside from the WM config you also need to use a compositor, configure your displays, probably start some daemons to handle config for GTK or whatever, etc.
3. i3wm specifically only support X11. There's a project called Sway that is basically an i3wm fork that supports Wayland, but who knows if it is kept in parity?
4. HiDPI really sucks. You can't get by with the couple of settings you'd use for Gnome, you have to configure like a dozen different things and some of them compete.
I don't know much about OpenBox...
I like i3wm a lot, but there are some problems:
1. Get the idea out of your head that you won't also need something like Gnome installed. There's too much useful software there, so you generally have it installed anyway.
2. There's a ton of messing with configuration to get things just right. It's amazingly flexible, but aside from the WM config you also need to use a compositor, configure your displays, probably start some daemons to handle config for GTK or whatever, etc.
3. i3wm specifically only support X11. There's a project called Sway that is basically an i3wm fork that supports Wayland, but who knows if it is kept in parity?
4. HiDPI really sucks. You can't get by with the couple of settings you'd use for Gnome, you have to configure like a dozen different things and some of them compete.
I don't know much about OpenBox...
I agree with you on the fact that, in certain instances, having something like GNOME installed would improve one's workflow (it's obviously a LOT more dynamic than any minimalist WM, i3 included). I also say aye to the fact that configuration is a time-consuming process and can be a major pain in the ass for new users. Also sucks that X11 is the only windowing system supported. I'll have to check out Sway, thanx for the tip. As far as HiDPI goes, I don't have much experience with that.
Hopefully, without running the risk of coming off as a total minimalist evangelist, I will say, however, that when properly configured (in a minimalist sort of manner), i3 has taken nearly everything I've thrown at it (besides gaming; but then again, what the fuck is the point in gaming on a Linux machine?). For instance, I run a lot of VMs, usually 2 simultaneously. Along with the VM itself, the guest OS will typically use multiple containers (2-3 containers, sometimes more). Because of these factors, I am a resource-pinching miser when it comes to my system(s). This is where WMs such as i3 have come to benefit me greatly. On an i3wm system, after I have completely configured the OS and i3, my idling RAM usage typically falls between 125-240mb, as opposed to the 1-1.5gb that Win7 uses under the same circumstances.
I like i3wm a lot, but there are some problems:
1. Get the idea out of your head that you won't also need something like Gnome installed. There's too much useful software there, so you generally have it installed anyway.
2. There's a ton of messing with configuration to get things just right. It's amazingly flexible, but aside from the WM config you also need to use a compositor, configure your displays, probably start some daemons to handle config for GTK or whatever, etc.
3. i3wm specifically only support X11. There's a project called Sway that is basically an i3wm fork that supports Wayland, but who knows if it is kept in parity?
4. HiDPI really sucks. You can't get by with the couple of settings you'd use for Gnome, you have to configure like a dozen different things and some of them compete.
I don't know much about OpenBox...
I agree with you on the fact that, in certain instances, having something like GNOME installed would improve one's workflow (it's obviously a LOT more dynamic than any minimalist WM, i3 included). I also say aye to the fact that configuration is a time-consuming process and can be a major pain in the ass for new users. Also sucks that X11 is the only windowing system supported. I'll have to check out Sway, thanx for the tip. As far as HiDPI goes, I don't have much experience with that.
Hopefully, without running the risk of coming off as a total minimalist evangelist, I will say, however, that when properly configured (in a minimalist sort of manner), i3 has taken nearly everything I've thrown at it (besides gaming; but then again, what the fuck is the point in gaming on a Linux machine?). For instance, I run a lot of VMs, usually 2 simultaneously. Along with the VM itself, the guest OS will typically use multiple containers (2-3 containers, sometimes more). Because of these factors, I am a resource-pinching miser when it comes to my system(s). This is where WMs such as i3 have come to benefit me greatly. On an i3wm system, after I have completely configured the OS and i3, my idling RAM usage typically falls between 125-240mb, as opposed to the 1-1.5gb that Win7 uses under the same circumstances.
I like i3wm a lot, but there are some problems:
1. Get the idea out of your head that you won't also need something like Gnome installed. There's too much useful software there, so you generally have it installed anyway.
2. There's a ton of messing with configuration to get things just right. It's amazingly flexible, but aside from the WM config you also need to use a compositor, configure your displays, probably start some daemons to handle config for GTK or whatever, etc.
3. i3wm specifically only support X11. There's a project called Sway that is basically an i3wm fork that supports Wayland, but who knows if it is kept in parity?
4. HiDPI really sucks. You can't get by with the couple of settings you'd use for Gnome, you have to configure like a dozen different things and some of them compete.
I don't know much about OpenBox...
I agree with you on the fact that, in certain instances, having something like GNOME installed would improve one's workflow (it's obviously a LOT more dynamic than any minimalist WM, i3 included). I also say aye to the fact that configuration is a time-consuming process and can be a major pain in the ass for new users. Also sucks that X11 is the only windowing system supported. I'll have to check out Sway, thanx for the tip. As far as HiDPI goes, I don't have much experience with that.
Hopefully, without running the risk of coming off as a total minimalist evangelist, I will say, however, that when properly configured (in a minimalist sort of manner), i3 has taken nearly everything I've thrown at it (besides gaming; but then again, what the fuck is the point in gaming on a Linux machine?). For instance, I run a lot of VMs, usually 2 simultaneously. Along with the VM itself, the guest OS will typically use multiple containers (2-3 containers, sometimes more). Because of these factors, I am a resource-pinching miser when it comes to my system(s). This is where WMs such as i3 have come to benefit me greatly. On an i3wm system, after I have completely configured the OS and i3, my idling RAM usage typically falls between 125-240mb, as opposed to the 1-1.5gb that Win7 uses under the same circumstances.
I have been using a Fluxbox setup for a while now, and I love it! It is however not for everyone, I can understand some people prefer that full featured desktop environment experience. However, I don't understand what useful software Gnome provides that would cause someone to have it installed along side a minimalist window manager.
The greatest thing in my opinion, is the text configuration files. All I need to do is back them up, and then I can use them on any computer. I'm not aware of any way to achieve this on something like Gnome or KDE. But, at the end of the day all that matters is that you're using something you're comfortable with.
What desktop environment is this?