The 2024 Presidential Election - Oops, We Did It Again

Jump to latest Follow Reply
M

monsterscraponme

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
122
Subscriptor++
  • #1
    Now that Haley has dropped out of the race the presidential primaries are effectively over. I figured a dedicated thread is appropriate (first thread created so I think topic is within rules)

    We've finally reached the moment everyone saw coming but no one was waiting for: a rematch of the 2020 election.

    We're at the beginning of our post-primary analysis, but still no surprise: Trump is still reportedly struggling in the burbs. I don't see that getting much better for Trump. Anecdata, but as a Virginian, I can say a fair amount of suburban Republicans I know are turned off by him, a sentiment that I've seen only grow stronger with time.

    NYT Gift - How Trump's Crushing Primary Triumph Masked Quiet Weaknesses
    Donald J. Trump’s daunting level of Republican support helped him vanquish a field of presidential primary rivals in under two months.

    But he still hasn’t won over one small but crucial group of voters — the men and women who cost him a second term in 2020.

    His overwhelming primary victories, including more than a dozen on Tuesday that pushed Nikki Haley from the race, have masked his long-term problems with voters who live in the suburbs, those who view themselves as moderates or independents, and Republicans who backed Joseph R. Biden Jr. in 2020.

    On Tuesday, Mr. Trump lost suburban precincts in Virginia despite carrying the state by a staggering 28 percentage points. In North Carolina, his 51-point victory was tempered by much narrower margins in the highly educated and affluent suburbs around Charlotte and Raleigh.
    Click to expand...

    We also know Biden is not that popular either. Also, have you heard he's old? I keep hearing it. So much you'd think the only thing he's done as president is age.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Cognac, FutureGuy and VividVerism
    Defenestrar

    Defenestrar

    Senator
    13,345
    Subscriptor++
  • #2
    monsterscraponme said:
    Anecdata, but as a Virginian, I can say a fair amount of suburban Republicans I know are turned off by him, a sentiment that I've seen only grow stronger with time.
    Click to expand...
    But are they more turned off by Biden? Which is the lesser evil?
    Vote for the least evil or stay home (or cast third party in a way that is electorally useless).


    That's the problem with first-past-the-post systems.
     
    • Sad
    Reactions: Lt_Storm
    Louis XVI

    Louis XVI

    Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
    9,984
    Subscriptor
  • #3
    The Washington Post went fishing for anecdata, asking a handful of Haley voters what they would do, now that it’s Trump vs. Biden. This response was…um…striking:
    I think [Trump is] so irrational and, really, very frightening. I think that if he allowed this January 6 thing to take place, he could try to take over the next time if he doesn’t win this one. I just think he’s dishonest and I don’t want that—but I think Biden is, too….I definitely won’t vote for Biden. I will have to vote for Trump.
    Click to expand...
    Honestly, she sounds exactly like my mother in law, who will hem and haw about how awful Trump is, and then vote for him anyway.
     
    • Wow
    • Like
    • Sad
    Reactions: Cognac, KAC, Zod and 9 others
    Lt_Storm

    Lt_Storm

    Ars Praefectus
    16,294
    Subscriptor++
  • #4
    From my perspective, it's not so much that we are seeing a 'rematch' of 2020; given circumstances, that wasn't ever really possible. Instead, things are so much fucking worse. I mean, the 2020 election cycle ended with an attempted insurrection, and, now, that's almost just table stakes. I mean, in 2020 we were having discussions about if Trump was going to try and overthrow the government, but, now, the we have Trump praising the people who were jailed for that insurrection attempt as 'heroes' to the applause of a crowd. Screaming isn't sufficient.

    But, Biden, a president who has made greater progress on climate change, the labor movement, child poverty, our staggering infrastructure debt, etc than any president in recent memory is, apparently, old so his still aged younger yet more decrepit opponent who, again, is praising the people who tried to overthrow our fucking government to keep him in power, apparently, a reasonable choice. Because old man is old or something. Screaming simply isn't sufficient.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Cognac, KAC, duffle and 15 others
    S

    Shavano

    Ars Legatus Legionis
    59,253
    Subscriptor
  • #5
    Louis XVI said:
    The Washington Post went fishing for anecdata, asking a handful of Haley voters what they would do, now that it’s Trump vs. Biden. This response was…um…striking:

    Honestly, she sounds exactly like my mother in law, who will hem and haw about how awful Trump is, and then vote for him anyway.
    Click to expand...
    Republican proven dishonesty plus expected overthrow of our system of government is not as bad as suspected dishonesty from a Democrat for these people. There's no helping these people; the best we can hope for is their dementia proceeds fast enough to completely prevent them from voting in the fall.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Zod and Citrine
    Technarch

    Technarch

    Ars Legatus Legionis
    10,199
    Subscriptor
  • #6
    Lt_Storm said:
    From my perspective, it's not so much that we are seeing a 'rematch' of 2020; given circumstances, that wasn't ever really possible. Instead, things are so much fucking worse. I mean, the 2020 election cycle ended with an attempted insurrection, and, now, that's almost just table stakes. I mean, in 2020 we were having discussions about if Trump was going to try and overthrow the government, but, now, the we have Trump praising the people who were jailed for that insurrection attempt as 'heroes' to the applause of a crowd. Screaming isn't sufficient.

    But, Biden, a president who has made greater progress on climate change, the labor movement, child poverty, our staggering infrastructure debt, etc than any president in recent memory is, apparently, old so his still aged younger yet more decrepit opponent who, again, is praising the people who tried to overthrow our fucking government to keep him in power, apparently, a reasonable choice. Because old man is old or something. Screaming simply isn't sufficient.
    Click to expand...

    And don't forget that Trump's first term was blunted by 'establishment' Republicans and a relatively hostile SCOTUS. Those guardrails won't be there the second time around.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Zod and DarthSlack
    T

    Thank You and Best of Luck!

    Ars Legatus Legionis
    18,171
    Subscriptor
  • #7
    Louis XVI said:
    The Washington Post went fishing for anecdata, asking a handful of Haley voters what they would do, now that it’s Trump vs. Biden. This response was…um…striking:

    Honestly, she sounds exactly like my mother in law, who will hem and haw about how awful Trump is, and then vote for him anyway.
    Click to expand...
    Yes. Propaganda is extremely effective. Perhaps one day Democrats will figure out how to leverage it themselves or at the very least figure out how to retard its effects.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: elliptic
    Lt_Storm

    Lt_Storm

    Ars Praefectus
    16,294
    Subscriptor++
  • #8
    Technarch said:
    And don't forget that Trump's first term was blunted by 'establishment' Republicans and a relatively hostile SCOTUS. Those guardrails won't be there the second time around.
    Click to expand...
    Oh, ya, none of this is an analysis of what a second Trump term would be like; that's a whole nother magnitude of need to scream. It's just the analysis of the campaign and election, along with the, at this point inevitable, attempt to overthrow the government when Americans (hopefully) decide not to vote for that insanity.
     
    Technarch

    Technarch

    Ars Legatus Legionis
    10,199
    Subscriptor
  • #12
    Dr Nno said:
    Watching from afar, I'd say you Muricans have an opportunity to fuck it up for all of us. And trusting the intelligence of the Average American Voter for our future may not be the most encouraging thought.
    Click to expand...

    You’re not wrong. Witness the inevitable result of decades of legalized corruption and media brainwashing. Learn from our fail.

    I find myself wishing that other countries would get in on the social media disinformation game. Only with disdisinformation. We seem to be unable to counter the flood of bullshit ourselves.
     
    G

    GloatingSwine

    Ars Praefectus
    3,064
  • #14
    monsterscraponme said:
    We also know Biden is not that popular either. Also, have you heard he's old? I keep hearing it. So much you'd think the only thing he's done as president is age.
    Click to expand...

    That's not fair, he's also stood and watched the Republican court to strip away abortion rights from a significant proportion of the female population of the nation without so much as a strong statement on what he's going to do about it.

    Even when he does talk about it he makes it very clear he's reluctantly doing so for political reasons and is personally anti-abortion for religious reasons.

    For just about every facet of the Democrat electorate Biden is the worst guy, Crime Bill Biden did as much as any Republican to criminalise Blackness, Bankruptcy Protection Biden did as much as any politician to skyrocket the student debts he's now belatedly somewhat relieving, Catholic Biden watched your abortion rights die and promises nothing because he wants nothing, and Zionist Biden is mildly perturbed about a genocide he's helped foment and arm the perpetrators of.

    Fear of Trump is all you've got unless someone can finally lodge a boot far enough up Biden's ass that he starts to make noise about how he's actually going to embrace the things his electorate wants instead of taking them for granted whilst his advisors cozy up to old white Republicans (and then blaming them if he loses instead of engaging in even a second of introspection. See: Hillary).
     
    necklessone

    necklessone

    Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
    8,644
    Subscriptor
  • #15
    GloatingSwine said:
    That's not fair, he's also stood and watched the Republican court to strip away abortion rights from a significant proportion of the female population of the nation without so much as a strong statement on what he's going to do about it.
    Click to expand...
    What exactly do you expect the president to do about this?
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Cognac, Baenwort, Zod and 3 others
    G

    GloatingSwine

    Ars Praefectus
    3,064
  • #17
    necklessone said:
    What exactly do you expect the president to do about this?
    Click to expand...

    Wrong question. The real question is "why would anyone vote for Biden if he won't?"

    The lesson the Democrats seem to refuse to learn is that their losses and failures are their fault not the fault of the electorate. They need to actually be the people that people want to vote for.

    wrylachlan said:
    Dat you Vlad?

    How you come away with that looking at his presidential record is beyond me.
    Click to expand...

    Is the genocide in Gaza still happening? Is the US still vetoing UN calls for that to change? Does he even have a plan to look like he gives a shit about abortion rights?

    If Biden loses it will be Biden's own fault. You absolutely need to work from that position if you don't want it to happen.
     
    necklessone

    necklessone

    Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
    8,644
    Subscriptor
  • #18
    GloatingSwine said:
    Wrong question. The real question is "why would anyone vote for Biden if he won't?"
    Click to expand...
    Won’t what? My question wasn’t the wrong question; the president is not an omnipotent dictator who can change federal and state laws in a whim.

    So what is Biden supposed to do about abortion rights?
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Cognac, Baenwort, Bardon and 3 others
    G

    GloatingSwine

    Ars Praefectus
    3,064
  • #19
    necklessone said:
    Won’t what? My question wasn’t the wrong question; the president is not an omnipotent dictator who can change federal and state laws in a whim.

    So what is Biden supposed to do about abortion rights?
    Click to expand...

    The president can at least sound like he wants to change those laws. Make a direct campaign promise that he's going to introduce legislation to provide that right and bully the next designated Democrat villain if they think about holding it up. Openly and publicly embrace a pro-choice position.

    But he won't, because Joe Biden on a personal level is anti-abortion.

    So he's going to vacillate and hem and haw about it and give absolutely nobody any hope that he'll do anything if he gets elected.
     
    DarthSlack

    DarthSlack

    Ars Legatus Legionis
    18,504
    Subscriptor++
  • #20
    GloatingSwine said:
    The president can at least sound like he wants to change those laws. Make a direct campaign promise that he's going to introduce legislation to provide that right and bully the next designated Democrat villain if they think about holding it up. Openly and publicly embrace a pro-choice position.

    But he won't, because Joe Biden on a personal level is anti-abortion.

    So he's going to vacillate and hem and haw about it and give absolutely nobody any hope that he'll do anything if he gets elected.
    Click to expand...

    From the White House:
    Today is an important milestone in ensuring access to mifepristone, a drug that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration as safe and effective for more than 20 years. With major retail pharmacy chains newly certified to dispense medication abortion, many women will soon have the option to pick up their prescription at a local, certified pharmacy—just as they would for any other medication. I encourage all pharmacies that want to pursue this option to seek certification.

    The stakes could not be higher for women across America. In the face of relentless attacks on reproductive freedom by Republican elected officials, Vice President Harris and I will continue to fight to ensure that women can get the health care they need, to defend the Food and Drug Administration’s independent and evidence-based approval and regulation of mifepristone, and to restore the protections of Roe v. Wade in federal law.
    Click to expand...

    Seems to me like that's the opposite of vacillating and hem and haw. So again, exactly what should he be doing?
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Cognac, Baenwort, Zod and 7 others
    M

    monsterscraponme

    Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
    122
    Subscriptor++
  • #21
    In late January, Biden publicly called on Congress to codify Roe V. Wade and called out Republicans on their dangerous positions, positions that are emboldened and made even more possible by Trump.

    I get I made a joke about Biden's age, but I think you may have read way too much into why I did that.

    And yes, I will admit I have fear of hard-right positions taking further root. I'm not ashamed to say that, but loosely equating Republicans to Democrats (even if that isn't your intention) should have went out of style after 2016.

    1/22/24 Transcript: Remarks by President Biden Before Meeting With His Task Force on Reproductive Healthcare Access
    Accompanying video of that speech
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Cognac, Zod, Bardon and 3 others
    Happysin

    Happysin

    Ars Legatus Legionis
    98,681
    Subscriptor++
  • #22
    Dr Nno said:
    Watching from afar, I'd say you Muricans have an opportunity to fuck it up for all of us. And trusting the intelligence of the Average American Voter for our future may not be the most encouraging thought.
    Click to expand...
    I will lean on what is hopefully prophetic wisdom about Americans from Winston Churchill. “Americans can always be trusted to do the right thing, once all other possibilities have been exhausted.”
     
    P

    puppies

    Ars Praefectus
    5,078
  • #23
    In 2024, the "both sides are the same" argument feels incredibly out of touch, especially with regard to abortion. When faced with a party that, in their estimation, doesn't work hard enough to secure women's rights, versus another one that is loudly hostile and outright regressive; how does anyone who genuinely cares about the issue not see the clear and present danger?
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Cognac, duffle, Zod and 6 others
    K

    karolus

    Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
    6,685
    Subscriptor++
  • #24
    puppies said:
    In 2024, the "both sides are the same" argument feels incredibly out of touch, especially with regard to abortion. When faced with a party that, in their estimation, doesn't work hard enough to secure women's rights, versus another one that is loudly hostile and outright regressive; how does anyone who genuinely cares about the issue not see the clear and present danger?
    Click to expand...
    People echoing that sentiment are betraying their privilege—many that do so have optionality to avoid the consequences of retrograde policies. They lack empathy for how those decisions affect the less fortunate who bear the consequences. Perhaps even feel a bit of contempt for those who vote against their best interests.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: duffle, LID919, DarthSlack and 3 others
    Louis XVI

    Louis XVI

    Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
    9,984
    Subscriptor
  • #25
    karolus said:
    People echoing that sentiment are betraying their privilege—many that do so have optionality to avoid the consequences of retrograde policies. They lack empathy for how those decisions affect the less fortunate who bear the consequences. Perhaps even feel a bit of contempt for those who vote against their best interests.
    Click to expand...
    Or rather, they think they have optionality to avoid the consequences. These things have a tendency to spiral beyond what people imagined.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: LID919, Gandhim3 and karolus
    papadage

    papadage

    Ars Legatus Legionis
    41,732
    Subscriptor++
  • #26
    Louis XVI said:
    Or rather, they think they have optionality to avoid the consequences. These things have a tendency to spiral beyond what people imagined.
    Click to expand...

    Nope, they are just being assholes. I am Gen-X, and every time I hear one of my generation call Biden a fossil and then effectively soft-pedal how much of a menace Trump would be in a second term, it's fucking infuriating. They m,ay vote for Biden in the end, but they give cover and encouragement to those who will not vote because Biden is old and does not conform to every position they want a candidate to conform to.

    It's bullshit. Biden has literally contributed to MORE progressive positions than Cart, Clinton, and Obama combined. There's a lot of dumb shit being said. Sure, his position on Israel and the Palestinian massacre is fucking terrible, but Trump's would be worse. Much worse. He would cover for their killing of every single Palestinian.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Cognac, Zod, Bardon and 4 others
    sword_9mm

    sword_9mm

    Ars Legatus Legionis
    22,802
    Subscriptor
  • #27
    People probably don't care enough about that stuff in general. The president is so far removed from daily life it's just turned into a sport-ball game to folks. Doesn't help that a lot of our votes don't even count so why bother. I'm not even sure why the sports-ball team folks care. I consider the presidency an illegitimate office honestly. When half our votes are thrown in the trash it's hard to give a shit. I got better things to do.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: dio82
    QtDevSvr

    QtDevSvr

    Ars Legatus Legionis
    11,701
    Subscriptor++
  • #32
    sword_9mm said:
    People probably don't care enough about that stuff in general. The president is so far removed from daily life it's just turned into a sport-ball game to folks. Doesn't help that a lot of our votes don't even count so why bother. I'm not even sure why the sports-ball team folks care. I consider the presidency an illegitimate office honestly. When half our votes are thrown in the trash it's hard to give a shit. I got better things to do.
    Click to expand...
    Do you mean that bolded statement literally? (To any significant extent? -- doesn't have to be "half".)
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Bardon
    Defenestrar

    Defenestrar

    Senator
    13,345
    Subscriptor++
  • #33
    QtDevSvr said:
    Do you mean that bolded statement literally? (To any significant extent? -- doesn't have to be "half".)
    Click to expand...
    First-past-the-post (FPTP) voting essentially does that. The losing "half" of the votes have no influence in the decision. That's why it's a system that optimizes for least-evil. Other voting systems, (instant runoff, ranked choice, approval, etc…) optimize for the best choice or the most consensus. Mathematically FPTP will devolve into a two-party system within a few election cycles and represent a minority of what people actually want.

    Here is a series of short fun videos that explains it really well without devolving into game theory jargon.

    Edit: This is also why I would have supported Lawrence Lessig when he tried running for president.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Cognac
    SunRaven01

    SunRaven01

    Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
    8,655
    Moderator
  • #40
    karolus said:
    It's similar to people who pride themselves on their lack of voter participation. Some get downright indignant when asked why they do so.
    Click to expand...
    I had the most amazing conversation with my dad about this -- Vietnam war veteran, resident of very rural north Florida. We never really talked about politics, but he was definitely biased by his experiences in war, and in the aftermath with the reception that veterans received back in the United States. I had him mentally put into the "conservative voter" box. He had an irrational hatred for Nancy Pelosi, but he could never articulate a reason for why.

    At one point, for really convoluted and facepalming reasons, he acquired a felony drug conviction. During the run up to the election season in another year, I was curious and asked him if Florida was a state that disenfranchised felons. He told me he didn't know what that word meant. I explained it mean that he had lost his right to vote. He said to me, and I quote this next part verbatim, that he had never voted, because, "we live under a totalitarian regime and I'm not voting to keep them in power."

    I was ... well, bemused is one word for it, I guess. Later again, during another primary season, I mentioned having voted for Warren, and he proudly told me he was a Bernie voter. I never did find out if he was adding voter fraud to his drug conviction.

    Ahhh, my father. I could tell you so many stories about that man. All of them too wild for Hollywood.
     
    • Like
    • Hug
    Reactions: Cognac, Bardon, karolus and 2 others
    You must log in or register to reply here.
    Jump to latest Follow Reply
    Jump to latest Follow Reply