The Battlefront Miscellaneous Thread

Horatio

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,069
Moderator
Hello Battlefronters!

This thread is for miscellaneous discussion of any BF topics. This thread replaces the existing perpetual threads, and will be recreated whenever the forum software falls over.

In this thread, we should plant seeds for discussions that will eventually be moved from this thread into their own, focused threads. To that end, the rule regarding post-n-runs will be somewhat relaxed - one still has to provide a meaningful summary of a link with some original argumentation, but we can play it more by ear in here. Once a discussion is deemed to have "legs", either by a decision of the participants in that conversation, or by moderation, a new thread must be created, and moderators will ask that the discussion be moved over there. In general, any page that crosses 2 page boundaries will be deemed to have "legs", but participants can start a new thread at any time, and mods will help move the conversation over there. New threads should have smaller scopes than the existing perpetual threads, and also avoid clickbaity/trollish/etc. titles.
 

Jeremy Reimer

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,010
Subscriptor++
I love it! Here, I'll start:

Amazon celebrates shutting down its last internal Oracle database

Larry Ellison had often said in public that Amazon could never switch over from Oracle because Oracle was too awesomely awesome and you couldn't run a business without it.

I hope to celebrate the day when the last company that still uses Oracle shuts off its last Oracle database!
 

Ecmaster76

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
14,667
Subscriptor

ant1pathy

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,461
I love it! Here, I'll start:

Amazon celebrates shutting down its last internal Oracle database

Larry Ellison had often said in public that Amazon could never switch over from Oracle because Oracle was too awesomely awesome and you couldn't run a business without it.

I hope to celebrate the day when the last company that still uses Oracle shuts off its last Oracle database!

Going to be a long time in coming. There's a big HR software stack that uses it, and entrenched in a few major companies/organizations.
 
So Microsoft is putting in a new Windows 10 update capability in 1803/1809 and upcoming 1903(May 2019 Update). The details are like this:

* You no longer need to be a 'seeker' to know there is an update. Meaning those of us on Windows 10 Pro who use Local Policy Editor to disable auto-updates currently have to force update to even know there is an update. Now the update UI will tell you there is an update you can download & install.

* Updates can be put off once a week for up to 5 weeks in a row. Once it reaches 35 days the update will auto-install.

This is still not acceptable to many people who want FULL control over when an update happens, but it's way better than the current situation. I think the main issue is that Microsoft knows that 80% of the W10 base would never update and they can't allow botnets to develop because people are never updating. Remember even iOS bugs you every day once an update becomes available, practically shoving it down your throat. There is no real escaping updates in this world where it's a constant race with malware/botnet/virus hackers.
 

Ragashingo

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,535
Subscriptor
Yeah... I don't fault Microsoft or Apple or anyone for auto updates... I just fault them for when things go horribly wrong.

One of my favorite stories about iOS updates (not going horribly wrong!) was the transition of all modern iOS devices from whatever they were using internally (HFS+ Journaled.. I guess?) to APFS. For two or three updates prior to the big rollout, Apple was actually having iPhones and iPads generate an AFPS version of the file system and then cross checking it against the existing HFS+ file system to see if everything worked right. They then wiped away the AFPS system and kept everyone on the HFS+ system without anyone knowing they'd even done the check. I don't think they ever said if there were errors in the early tests, but by the time iOS 10.3 came out and auto converted hundreds of millions of iOS devices to AFPS, Apple knew it was going to work flawlessly.

Microsoft, instead, sorta kinda accidentally deleted a bunch of people's data because they didn't cross check across all of the systems Windows 10 was installed on. Not that Apple never screws things up, they totally do, but I wish everyone all the time did it the APFS way where the results were known ahead of time instead of pushing out updates and then cleaning up the mess.
 

wco81

Ars Legatus Legionis
28,661
I could have answered in this thread but I imagine it will be ended in favor of this Misc. thread:

viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1383995&hilit=alexa&start=40


Apple cuts HomePod speaker price from $349 to $299.

Still too much especially way over the market leader.

But seems like there isn't as much hype around these speakers with agents any more. Maybe it will ramp up again for the holiday buying season.

Or maybe the fad is leveling off? Again, the most common uses are to ask about the weather, play songs, set timers.

All the advertising is about how Alexa will be compatible with smart home gadgets but maybe that's another fad that will fade too.
 

Louis XVI

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,981
Subscriptor
I could have answered in this thread but I imagine it will be ended in favor of this Misc. thread:

viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1383995&hilit=alexa&start=40


Apple cuts HomePod speaker price from $349 to $299.

Still too much especially way over the market leader.

But seems like there isn't as much hype around these speakers with agents any more. Maybe it will ramp up again for the holiday buying season.

Or maybe the fad is leveling off? Again, the most common uses are to ask about the weather, play songs, set timers.

All the advertising is about how Alexa will be compatible with smart home gadgets but maybe that's another fad that will fade too.
The price cut is a step in the right direction. I'd really like one of these speakers, so I can ask about the weather, play songs, and set timers. (Why don't you consider those important uses?)

But I really don't trust Amazon or Google with an always on microphone in my house. Apple so far has done a better job with privacy, and I'm all in on the ecosystem (e.g., Apple music), so I'd really like to buy an Apple version.

No way am I doing it at $349, or even $300, though. If they made an Apple version of an Amazon Echo for $200, I'd be all over it.
 

wco81

Ars Legatus Legionis
28,661
I could have answered in this thread but I imagine it will be ended in favor of this Misc. thread:

viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1383995&hilit=alexa&start=40


Apple cuts HomePod speaker price from $349 to $299.

Still too much especially way over the market leader.

But seems like there isn't as much hype around these speakers with agents any more. Maybe it will ramp up again for the holiday buying season.

Or maybe the fad is leveling off? Again, the most common uses are to ask about the weather, play songs, set timers.

All the advertising is about how Alexa will be compatible with smart home gadgets but maybe that's another fad that will fade too.
The price cut is a step in the right direction. I'd really like one of these speakers, so I can ask about the weather, play songs, and set timers. (Why don't you consider those important uses?)

But I really don't trust Amazon or Google with an always on microphone in my house. Apple so far has done a better job with privacy, and I'm all in on the ecosystem (e.g., Apple music), so I'd really like to buy an Apple version.

No way am I doing it at $349, or even $300, though. If they made an Apple version of an Amazon Echo for $200, I'd be all over it.

I'm not saying they're unimportant. Just saying that the marketing and the hype is around more intelligent and conversational AI which can do many glorious things.

But it turns out most people who get these products use them for rather prosaic functions, compared to say turning off your light, controlling your thermostat, etc.
 
Unsurprisingly, like Google and others, MS is full of scumbags:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/201 ... red-by-hr/

Hopefully that email thread didn't leak with the names still attached, because as we saw in the Google case, that gave some of the worst people on the internet a doxxing opportunity.

Big surprise that any organization with 100K+ employees has some scumbags in it. We have no idea how many of them there are, much less to make the allegation of 'full', implying a huge percentage.
 

Paul Hill

Ars Legatus Legionis
19,878
We have no idea how many of them there are

Another said that she had been called a “bitch” at work more than once, and found it was pervasive in the company. “We did a roundtables with the women when I was in Xbox core [team] & every woman, except for 1, had been called a bitch at work,” the Microsoft employee wrote. “Before people say this is just an Xbox thing (as I’ve heard that dismissiveness way too many times within Microsoft before) the other eng [engineering] orgs where my experiences happened were Windows & Azure. This is a Microsoft thing, a common one.”

This is fucking horrible but not unexpected. God damn this industry sucks sometimes.
 

ant1pathy

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,461
I could have answered in this thread but I imagine it will be ended in favor of this Misc. thread:

viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1383995&hilit=alexa&start=40


Apple cuts HomePod speaker price from $349 to $299.

Still too much especially way over the market leader.

But seems like there isn't as much hype around these speakers with agents any more. Maybe it will ramp up again for the holiday buying season.

Or maybe the fad is leveling off? Again, the most common uses are to ask about the weather, play songs, set timers.

All the advertising is about how Alexa will be compatible with smart home gadgets but maybe that's another fad that will fade too.
The price cut is a step in the right direction. I'd really like one of these speakers, so I can ask about the weather, play songs, and set timers. (Why don't you consider those important uses?)

But I really don't trust Amazon or Google with an always on microphone in my house. Apple so far has done a better job with privacy, and I'm all in on the ecosystem (e.g., Apple music), so I'd really like to buy an Apple version.

No way am I doing it at $349, or even $300, though. If they made an Apple version of an Amazon Echo for $200, I'd be all over it.

I would very much like one because of all of the reasons you listed, plus the legitimately good sounding audio. I just don't have anywhere to put one; not an enormous townhouse, and I have speakers covering most spaces already.
 

wrylachlan

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,768
Subscriptor
Unsurprisingly, like Google and others, MS is full of scumbags:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/201 ... red-by-hr/

Hopefully that email thread didn't leak with the names still attached, because as we saw in the Google case, that gave some of the worst people on the internet a doxxing opportunity.

Big surprise that any organization with 100K+ employees has some scumbags in it. We have no idea how many of them there are, much less to make the allegation of 'full', implying a huge percentage.
So you read about this behavior and your first instinct is not outrage at the perpetrators nor empathy for the victims but rather concern about innocent bystanders being falsely implicated... :facepalm:
 

LordDaMan

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,090
Unsurprisingly, like Google and others, MS is full of scumbags:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/201 ... red-by-hr/

Hopefully that email thread didn't leak with the names still attached, because as we saw in the Google case, that gave some of the worst people on the internet a doxxing opportunity.

Big surprise that any organization with 100K+ employees has some scumbags in it. We have no idea how many of them there are, much less to make the allegation of 'full', implying a huge percentage.
So you read about this behavior and your first instinct is not outrage at the perpetrators nor empathy for the victims but rather concern about innocent bystanders being falsely implicated... :facepalm:

You are right. We should hang everyone at microsoft. In fact we should dox every single person there and their families. We should have protestors on the street saying how horrible every single person is. We should raze their homes and salt the earth so nothing ever grows there again.
 

wrylachlan

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,768
Subscriptor
Unsurprisingly, like Google and others, MS is full of scumbags:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/201 ... red-by-hr/

Hopefully that email thread didn't leak with the names still attached, because as we saw in the Google case, that gave some of the worst people on the internet a doxxing opportunity.

Big surprise that any organization with 100K+ employees has some scumbags in it. We have no idea how many of them there are, much less to make the allegation of 'full', implying a huge percentage.
So you read about this behavior and your first instinct is not outrage at the perpetrators nor empathy for the victims but rather concern about innocent bystanders being falsely implicated... :facepalm:

You are right. We should hang everyone at microsoft. In fact we should dox every single person there and their families. We should have protestors on the street saying how horrible every single person is. We should raze their homes and salt the earth so nothing ever grows there again.
Read what I actually wrote. Protect the innocent? Sure. Innocent until proven guilty? Absolutely. But when you read about these sorts of things and jump to that as the most important issue in the situation before a) empathy for the victims or b) outrage at the perpetrators... I’d argue there is something very very wrong.
 

LordDaMan

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,090
Unsurprisingly, like Google and others, MS is full of scumbags:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/201 ... red-by-hr/

Hopefully that email thread didn't leak with the names still attached, because as we saw in the Google case, that gave some of the worst people on the internet a doxxing opportunity.

Big surprise that any organization with 100K+ employees has some scumbags in it. We have no idea how many of them there are, much less to make the allegation of 'full', implying a huge percentage.
So you read about this behavior and your first instinct is not outrage at the perpetrators nor empathy for the victims but rather concern about innocent bystanders being falsely implicated... :facepalm:

You are right. We should hang everyone at microsoft. In fact we should dox every single person there and their families. We should have protestors on the street saying how horrible every single person is. We should raze their homes and salt the earth so nothing ever grows there again.
Read what I actually wrote. Protect the innocent? Sure. Innocent until proven guilty? Absolutely. But when you read about these sorts of things and jump to that as the most important issue in the situation before a) empathy for the victims or b) outrage at the perpetrators... I’d argue there is something very very wrong.

No I understand fully, but people get too fanatical nowadays and just ignore things like rule of law or even if the story makes any sense. Take for instance your comment just now. If they are innocent until proven guilty then why you except someone to show outrage to the people being accused? That would mean they are already guilty.

I would say go ahead and investigate the problem. Find facts and make judgement calls on that. Use your brain and not your heart because the later ends up with witch hunts
 
I could have answered in this thread but I imagine it will be ended in favor of this Misc. thread:

viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1383995&hilit=alexa&start=40


Apple cuts HomePod speaker price from $349 to $299.

Still too much especially way over the market leader.

But seems like there isn't as much hype around these speakers with agents any more. Maybe it will ramp up again for the holiday buying season.

Or maybe the fad is leveling off? Again, the most common uses are to ask about the weather, play songs, set timers.

All the advertising is about how Alexa will be compatible with smart home gadgets but maybe that's another fad that will fade too.
The price cut is a step in the right direction. I'd really like one of these speakers, so I can ask about the weather, play songs, and set timers. (Why don't you consider those important uses?)

But I really don't trust Amazon or Google with an always on microphone in my house. Apple so far has done a better job with privacy, and I'm all in on the ecosystem (e.g., Apple music), so I'd really like to buy an Apple version.

No way am I doing it at $349, or even $300, though. If they made an Apple version of an Amazon Echo for $200, I'd be all over it.


Ironic given the direction this thread just took with Microsoft's internal issues, but I'd prefer Cortana over Siri even in this space. And the Harmon Kardon speaker is still cheaper, but there were 3 issues.

1: Price obviously, but specifically the FireTV CUBE was just a 1 stop shop that did everythink I needed in the smarthome space.
2: My 7 year old started to demand Alexa or google. He would have been fine with Cortana if we had gotten it, but Alexa/google was what he asked for.
3: He also wanted a tablet and the Fire HD kids addition was a complete and total nobrainer. Especially at holiday pricing. It was literally the only product in the market at an appropriate price.

MS has some of the pieces with Cortana and it wouldn't be completely painful to use it, but the financial realities combined with slight social pressure just made it extremely hard.

Apple has some percentage of user base that is immune to parts of this at least, but they will never be more than a boutique choice in the space with the pricing where it is and MS....I don't even know. The Cortana ecosystem feels so much like Windowsphone, though the barrier to entry is a bit less.
 

wrylachlan

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,768
Subscriptor
So you read about this behavior and your first instinct is not outrage at the perpetrators nor empathy for the victims but rather concern about innocent bystanders being falsely implicated... :facepalm:
You are right. We should hang everyone at microsoft. In fact we should dox every single person there and their families. We should have protestors on the street saying how horrible every single person is. We should raze their homes and salt the earth so nothing ever grows there again.
Read what I actually wrote. Protect the innocent? Sure. Innocent until proven guilty? Absolutely. But when you read about these sorts of things and jump to that as the most important issue in the situation before a) empathy for the victims or b) outrage at the perpetrators... I’d argue there is something very very wrong.
No I understand fully, but people get too fanatical nowadays and just ignore things like rule of law or even if the story makes any sense. Take for instance your comment just now. If they are innocent until proven guilty then why you except someone to show outrage to the people being accused? That would mean they are already guilty.

I would say go ahead and investigate the problem. Find facts and make judgement calls on that. Use your brain and not your heart because the later ends up with witch hunts
Innocent until proven guilty applies to specific known individuals accused of an actual crime. When many many women all experience the same thing I’m inclined to believe them. Certainly not enough to send someone to prison based solely on that evidence - that’s the high bar of ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ but enough to have an initial empathetic reaction. And I don’t think it’s particularly ‘fanatical’ to say that the proper reaction to a a lot of women corroborating an experience like this should start with a) empathy and b) some level of outrage simply based on the overwhelming evidence.
 

papadage

Ars Legatus Legionis
41,731
Subscriptor++
Pretty much. "Innocent until proven guilty" is for criminal trials.

But if a company systematically refuses to address shitty behavior toward classes of people, then name and shame is a worthy alternative. This got to this point because line HR staff were not addressing shitty behavior, and women were facing career suicide for complaining about harassment or not being treated on an equal basis to men on their teams.

So, fuck the mewling for the tech-bros.
 

LordDaMan

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,090
And I don’t think it’s particularly ‘fanatical’ to say that the proper reaction to a a lot of women corroborating an experience like this should start with a) empathy and b) some level of outrage simply based on the overwhelming evidence.

Yes, it is. For all we know one of SurfaceAlien's family could have been falsely accused of a crime and he wants to make sure that never ever happens to anyone again.

You don't have facts, you have emotions. Emotions without facts lead to really bad outcomes.
 

wrylachlan

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,768
Subscriptor
For all we know one of SurfaceAlien's family could have been falsely accused of a crime and he wants to make sure that never ever happens to anyone again.

You don't have facts, you have emotions. Emotions without facts lead to really bad outcomes.
There aren’t enough :rolleyes: in the world for that sentiment. But I shouldn’t be surprised. This is a finely honed tactic of the status quo: deflect by concern trolling about the accusation being overbroad. No one is buying it.
 
Yes, it is. For all we know one of SurfaceAlien's family could have been falsely accused of a crime and he wants to make sure that never ever happens to anyone again.

You don't have facts, you have emotions. Emotions without facts lead to really bad outcomes.

I have not gone through a false allegation against me(thank god) but I have empathy for those who have. I will not just blanket condemn all male engineers in the tech industry as 'bros who are probably rapists'. This kind of thinking is toxic and shouldn't happen.
 

Megalodon

Ars Legatus Legionis
34,201
Subscriptor++
No I understand fully, but people get too fanatical nowadays and just ignore things like rule of law or even if the story makes any sense. Take for instance your comment just now. If they are innocent until proven guilty then why you except someone to show outrage to the people being accused? That would mean they are already guilty.
This reads like you are being extraordinarily careless about the distinction between guilt or innocence of a specific individual (where innocent until proven guilty applies with respect to criminal charges) and an informal assessment of the prevailing conditions at a corporation. We're not talking about a criminal trial, we're not even talking about civil liability, we're asking is it shitty to work there as a woman. And when women overwhelmingly say yes it's shitty, they're usually right. The reality is there's personal and professional consequences for a women going on record about harassment so when there's widespread reports they're rarely wrong.

How this tends to work is disadvantaged groups get hit first and worst with harassment problems but these things tend to metastasize and everyone is impacted. So while I'm clearly not going to lock anyone up over this, I will regard Microsoft's HR is good enough at gaming the complaint process that there's no incentive to address problems and it's better to avoid working there. Their recruiters cold call me a couple times a year so presumably they're not entirely indifferent to this. Last I checked it's their job to sell me on working there and if I have indications of trouble even if it's a heuristic I'm totally free to decline on that basis.
 
A number of things can be true here:

1. Microsoft HR is toxic and anti-employee
2. There is a general toxic atmosphere at Microsoft, not only sexual
3. There have been some sexual harassment incidents
4. There are false allegations
5. All these things are true throughout the tech industry and other professional industries

But everything has to dissolve down to 'hurr durr MS evil'...
 

Louis XVI

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,981
Subscriptor
But everything has to dissolve down to 'hurr durr MS evil'...

Both the original post on this subject and the first non-you response went out of their way to point out this problem is not limited to Microsoft:

Horatio":p0wh1555 said:
Unsurprisingly, like Google and others, MS is full of scumbags:

Paul Hill":p0wh1555 said:
This is fucking horrible but not unexpected. God damn this industry sucks sometimes.

(Emphasis added.)

You're the one making this solely about Microsoft, with your monomaniacal need to defend it against all perceived comers. Get out of bunker and look around sometime; you might enjoy the view and broaden your perspective a little bit.
 
I do see the industry wide issues. However to boil everything down to misogyny is missing the forest through the trees. The fact is the industry is filled with a lot of horrible human beings treating other human beings horribly. Where is the outrage over verbal abuse, bad reviews, chronic overworking and other forms of abuse? Why single out just this one aspect?
 

wrylachlan

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,768
Subscriptor
I would hope all employees get redress for the abuse they suffer, no matter which kind.
Status quo tactic #2: Take a clear, specific, narrow and actionable problem and paint it as simply a subset of a more nebulous, large and harder to tackle problem. Then imply that those concerned with the more specific problem are uncaring about those affected by the larger problem and out of touch with what’s really important. Nope.

Is general bad conduct a thing in the tech industry? Absolutely. Is misogyny a problem on top of the general assholeness? You bet. If we wanted to take a first meaningful step towards lowering the aggregate total volume of assholeness in tech where should we start? By protecting women.
 

Megalodon

Ars Legatus Legionis
34,201
Subscriptor++
I do see the industry wide issues. However to boil everything down to misogyny is missing the forest through the trees.
No one is doing that and in fact in my post above I make it clear I don't even think treatment of women is solely attributable to misogyny.

The fact is the industry is filled with a lot of horrible human beings treating other human beings horribly. Where is the outrage over verbal abuse, bad reviews, chronic overworking and other forms of abuse? Why single out just this one aspect?
The reality is that problems often require targeted remedies so we have to be able to discuss specific problems to deal with them. And while it makes sense to address multiple problems it also makes sense to do a little triage and my opinion as a white dude working in tech is that problems like sexism and racism are worse than the problems I deal with so treating them with more urgency is appropriate.

And, guess what, if we look at generalizable remedies that help all workers, like halting forced arbitration, it's the women trying to deal with sexual harassment that have actually managed to make real progress. So not only is your vague platitude approach incapable of dealing with targeted remedies, it's also objectively terrible at the broadly helpful changes you claim to support.
 

Horatio

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,069
Moderator
It's not helpful to elevate one class of problem above the other.
Counterpoint: you are wrong. Combating problems that target an already marginalized group is a righteous endeavor. The tech industry is hard on everyone involved - it's one of the reasons salaries are high - giving women extra problems is unacceptable. Hey I get where you're coming from, but fortunately the industry is changing, and we are starting to understand that diversity is good for everyone and that it is part of every engineer's job to promote and preserve diversity and inclusion.
 

lithven

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,932
I'm going to preface this with a few comments. First, I'm a male and I don't work in the computing field but I do work in a similar engineering field where 80+% of my coworkers are male and I assume the culture isn't that different. Additionally, I am speaking in general hypotheticals and from my own experiences and I am explicitly not stating the Microsoft complaints should have been ignored without further investigation from HR and/or management. Finally, I absolutely believe there is still blatant and purposeful sexism in the workforce and anyone who is engaged in it should be dealt with in whatever manner is appropriate (HR, civil lawsuits, etc.).

Having said that, I think the bigger problem, that leads to an uncomfortable work environment for women, is one of the default "male culture" and not a result of intentional sexism. Simply put I think a lot of men are just as big of $#@holes to each other as they are to women. The two examples in the Ars article I could very easily see happening in my work place to a receiver of either gender. Specifically from the following excerpt, "such as one woman being told to sit on another coworker's lap or a woman in a technical role having her contribution to a project restricted to booking meeting rooms, making dinner reservations, and taking minutes." The first is something I actually have heard when someone walked into a meeting after the room was full past the point of standing room only. It wasn't a woman who received the comment either. It was a joke about how full/undersized the room was for the meeting. The second example just seems like typical work group clique crap that I and others I know have put up with in various positions. If you're not in some clique you get the crap assignments. Another example I've seen raised in other forums is women being talked over instead of being allowed to provide their input. That happens all the time and just about everyone has experienced it. Let me reiterate I am not stating the issues raised at Microsoft aren't completely and specifically about sexism, nor am I saying HR/management was right to dismiss them without a complete investigation of the complaint. I'm saying some of the defensiveness in these type of discussions I believe stem from similar experiences to my own that drive people to dismiss these complaints out of hand as just the normal office culture.

So, this brings me to the question of how do we address it if it isn't just about sexism? We address it by improving the culture in general. One way to improve the culture is to bring more women into the engineering and technical work force. I think if we had the 50/50 mix the culture would improve just through breaking the critical mass that allows the current culture to remain. The only problem there is we need to feed the pipeline so to speak. We can't get to a 50/50 ratio of engineers in business if universities are still graduating a 90/10 or even 75/25 mix of STEM degrees and we can't graduate a 50/50 mix if the applications to the department or program is a 95/5 mix. (Note, I realize this could be seen as asking women to fix a bad culture that men have caused, but I intend it more as an observation of a fact than a request for help.)

The other way to fix the culture is by actively and deliberately being more respectful of each other. I know I've tried to change the culture around me by calling people out for some less than appropriate comments, by actively spreading work around more evenly and encouraging my co-workers, leads, managers, etc. to do the same, and by not talking over others and trying to not allow others to either (or explicitly going back to the person who was interrupted and asking them to continue). But, I know I'm not perfect. I've cut off or talked over more than one person. Especially when I feel they are missing the point or dragging the conversation off on a tangent (although I try to catch myself). I've also made the occasional comment or joke that wasn't appropriate (and apologized immediately when I realize how wrong I was or when someone called me out on it). It's something I actively work on every day and try to think about in every interaction I have regardless of the other party's sex.

Anyways that's my 1/2 cent.
 

Horatio

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,069
Moderator
The only problem there is we need to feed the pipeline so to speak. We can't get to a 50/50 ratio of engineers in business if universities are still graduating a 90/10 or even 75/25 mix of STEM degrees and we can't graduate a 50/50 mix if the applications to the department or program is a 95/5 mix.
Actually, we kinda can. One thing we (tech companies) can do is choose who we interview. One thing my company is doing is to have 50% of intern interviews go to women and other URMs, and close to that for FTE interviews (they're a little less regulated). That doesn't guarantee that we hire evenly, but it creates incentives for more women to go into tech, and for universities to recruit women more heavily too.
The other way to fix the culture is by actively and deliberately being more respectful of each other. I know I've tried to change the culture around me by calling people out for some less than appropriate comments, by actively spreading work around more evenly and encouraging my co-workers, leads, managers, etc. to do the same
Sure - one thing we're also starting to do is penalize people who are jerks. We're in the midst of review season now, and I've had explicit conversations with other managers where we are giving lower review scores to people who are brilliant technically, but do not foster an inclusive environment. These people, despite their technical chops, are actually bad engineers, and now we're making that clear. In the past, people were mostly rewarded for technical prowess, and that seems to have led to the toxic, shitty, gatekeeping behaviors that it turns out have been killing our productivity for years.