What is the state of non-smartphones these days?

GeneralFailureDriveA

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,185
Subscriptor
Some years ago, it appeared most flip and candy bar phones were KaiOS based, and I have heard nothing good about its long term stability and operation for any level of heavy phone use.

There are weird one-off devices as the LightPhones, yet I cannot find reviews of them as a long term device either.

What else is out there in non-smart devices that can handle actual modern use in phone calls and texting?
 

Paladin

Ars Legatus Legionis
32,552
Subscriptor
Seems kinda like asking what's the state of can openers these days. ;) Pick one that looks good and try it out. Return it if you don't like it. Use it if you do. They don't have enough features and functions to really worry about it too much. They're mostly made to be disposable too so the prices are low and they don't have much ability to be repaired, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: m0nckywrench

cateye

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,760
Moderator
Oddly enough, I was recently browsing options for non-smart cellular phones, on behalf of an elderly parent who struggles to use and understand modern "glass slab" UI/UX.

It's slim pickings indeed. Kyocera, Nokia, and TCL were the brands I saw most often. Their products were all completely indistinguishable—tech specs were the same except for the the most minor deviations. it makes me wonder if they're all using the same commodity, off-the-shelf logic boards at this point and just differentiating with case shapes and colors. There were some interesting hardened options, like extreme impact or water resistance. Good for using at the job site if you were, say, an especially clumsy construction worker prone to falling in giant muddy holes.

An of course, there are the senior-oriented options like the JitterBug, which (still) aren't technologically any different, but tend to promote concierge-style customer service, easy to understand service plans, and hyper-simplified custom interfaces.

So yeah, what Paladin said: In my experience, as a resident of the U.S., if that's the kind of phone you want, I see no reason to do anything beyond buying whatever is cheap and looks good. It's likely to work identically to everything else in that forgotten and dying product group. No idea if the situation is different somewhere like Europe or the developing world.

EDIT: Grammar, and also to note that due to my goals, I wasn't considering enthusiast or boutique devices like Punkt, etc.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't say Light Phone and Punkt MP-02 are one offs, both are selling the second model at this point. Mudita Pure may be, I'm hoping they come back with better sequel. I feel like even smart phone release cadence is way too fast. I'd much rather have a release every couple years, and longer support. When it comes to a dumb phone, all you really need is an occasional revision to fix hardware bugs, and add bands. Both Punkt and Light Phone are continuing to develop new features for their phones, which to me is what matters. Light Phone recently got calendar sync for example, and I think the Punkt got Signal support just fairly recently with Pigeon 2.0.

Jose Briones is going to be your friend here, both his youtube channel and https://dumbphones.pory.app/

There's also r/dumbphones

Personally, I've been using a Pixel 5 running stripped down Lineage OS. I'm probably going to get a Light Phone in coming months, unless someone releases Spotify support.
 

GeneralFailureDriveA

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,185
Subscriptor
I wouldn't say Light Phone and Punkt MP-02 are one offs, both are selling the second model at this point.

I mostly mean one-off in that they are running entirely their own OS stack - as far as I know, the light phone is not running an OS based on anything else. This can be a feature, certainly, but it means a harder boundary on "It is what it is," vs something that can be extended or modded, or even run whatever limited apps it has (KaiOS has an app store, though nothing complex in it).

Personally, I've been using a Pixel 5 running stripped down Lineage OS. I'm probably going to get a Light Phone in coming months, unless someone releases Spotify support.

A concern I have with the light phone is that it cannot display images at all in text threads, and "send or receive an image of something" is, unfortunately, common enough that it would be difficult to entirely remove that functionality.

The Sonim devices seem rugged and robust, though. I may look into them more.
 
I mostly mean one-off in that they are running entirely their own OS stack - as far as I know, the light phone is not running an OS based on anything else. This can be a feature, certainly, but it means a harder boundary on "It is what it is," vs something that can be extended or modded, or even run whatever limited apps it has (KaiOS has an app store, though nothing complex in it).

I can see that. But these are products that are inherently simple, so having open extensibility would likely be problematic, leading to a slippery slope as people who miss the point want more functionality. I'd like Spotify, and proper calendar sync, but maybe those things will come eventually. If not, oh well.

Be wary of KaiOS. If you want an app store, you're likely better off with a Pixel running Graphene/Calyx/Lineage and stripped down. Or if you want something small, a Unihertz device stripped down using ADB. There have also been some candybar Xiaomi devices that had US bands hacked in, though last I checked they were no longer available, and new versions didn't have this capability, or it hadn't been discovered yet.

A concern I have with the light phone is that it cannot display images at all in text threads, and "send or receive an image of something" is, unfortunately, common enough that it would be difficult to entirely remove that functionality.

Yeah, that's an unfortunate side effect of the e-ink display, I suppose. It would be nice if Light Phone would develop a desktop app for SMS and such, and add that capability there. But my general attitude is still, whatever, folks should get Signal. And eventually I'll jump into Matrix and probably setup an SMS bridge. I'm not sure I even want SMS on my phone, at this point.

I miss the days before I was captive to a connected lifestyle, it has not been good for my mental health.
 

GeneralFailureDriveA

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,185
Subscriptor
Be wary of KaiOS.

Do you have any specific reasons? It feels insecure and very "Graduate's First Phone OS" in many ways. I've tried it, and found it wanting, but neither have I looked hard at the security stance of it beyond "Seems written by web devs, for web devs, and that answers a lot of my questions."

Yeah, that's an unfortunate side effect of the e-ink display, I suppose.

I don't know why it would be. My Kobos handle images just fine, in greyscale.

But my general attitude is still, whatever, folks should get Signal.

It's an improvement over many things, but is still oddly restricted - your root of identity must be a smartphone, without going through heroics, and I'm uncertain as to if the phone apps allow you to be a slave device to another root of identity. I understand it for anti-abuse reasons, but, still, it's annoying in many ways.

And eventually I'll jump into Matrix and probably setup an SMS bridge. I'm not sure I even want SMS on my phone, at this point.

Matrix is excellent, with all the bridges. I encourage it!

I miss the days before I was captive to a connected lifestyle, it has not been good for my mental health.

It has not. We must fight against it!
 
Do you have any specific reasons?

Pretty much the same as you. It seems to have very disorganized development effort, resulting in a buggy and insecure OS. The lack of Spotify, and otherwise India-centric app landscape, made me discard it from the running early on. I wish Mozilla had kept on with it. Now I'm hoping for some solid mobile Linux distros in the next 5-8 years.

I don't know why it would be. My Kobos handle images just fine, in greyscale.

I guess I kind of assumed they didn't want to deal with complaints about quality, or that the grayscale compromise wasn't worth making in general.

It's an improvement over many things, but is still oddly restricted - your root of identity must be a smartphone

I think you can set an Android tablet as your root identity, so long as you can respond to a text message on the phone number you set. At least I hope you can, I won't have a chance to try until I pick up a Pixel Tablet on the impending deep discount, and install Graphene or Calyx on it. I'm planning on shifting my typical phone usage to that, and just have a dumb phone when I'm out and about.
 

GeneralFailureDriveA

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,185
Subscriptor
I have found some security analysis papers of KaiOS that do not leave much hope for it against any variety of moderately skilled attacker.


https://figi.itu.int/wp-content/upl...ure-phone-platform-for-DFS-applications-1.pdf details the lack of basic HTML sanity checks in many preinstalled applications on 2.5, and is otherwise the sort of paper that is fun to read, as the analysis team clearly enjoyed the wide range of security faults that they were able to demonstrate against the punching bag target of KaiOS.
 

RJVB

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,906
I think it is; as the older devices tended to be used far longer. They were not artificially obsoleted as computers in the 90s were by the need for more RAM, they did one thing, and did it well.


What do you call the disappearance of network bands then?

I still have 2 Motorola flip phones (including 1 that was labelled as a "smartphone") which I both used with Dutch prepaid SIMs until not that long ago. A few months ago I had reason to try my French SIM card in them; neither would connect anymore.
 

GeneralFailureDriveA

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,185
Subscriptor
(yes, I am aware of bumping a somewhat older thread, as it is under a year old and still relevant, may this be permissible?)

What do you call the disappearance of network bands then?

I apologize, I had not seen this. Yes, I consider this artificial obsolescence, as all US carriers, at least, appear to have removed all but Voice over LTE support for basic phone calls roughly together.

Since last updates, a dumbphone finder has been created: https://josebriones.org/dumbphone-finder highlighting a larger selection than I was aware of.
 

GeneralFailureDriveA

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,185
Subscriptor
Hmmm, here we only know (remember?) 2G, 3G and 4G for network names ;)

Voice traditionally ran over 2G and eventually 3G bands. There exists 4G voice support, yet, it is not commonly deployed in the US, as carriers jumped straight to VoLTE technology, which is now present in the current list of phones. It dates back to perhaps the iPhone 6 era? Modern devices use some variants of 5G to drain the battery more effectively, yet I am not clear as to if technologiies to run voice over 5G links have yet been deployed in the field (perhaps VoNR?).
 

alex7xl

Seniorius Lurkius
6
Voice traditionally ran over 2G and eventually 3G bands. There exists 4G voice support, yet, it is not commonly deployed in the US, as carriers jumped straight to VoLTE technology, which is now present in the current list of phones. It dates back to perhaps the iPhone 6 era? Modern devices use some variants of 5G to drain the battery more effectively, yet I am not clear as to if technologiies to run voice over 5G links have yet been deployed in the field (perhaps VoNR?).

Yes, the name is VoNR - Voice over New Radio is a 5G high-speed wireless communication standard for mobile phones and data terminals