In all honesty, and I hate to be overly trite, I think this really is a big part of it. Top execs get steeped in years of asskissing and underlings laughing at their dumb jokes, so coming into the office for them is GREAT. Everyone treats them like gold, so of course it seems very “collaborative”. For all of us peons, however, how is it more collaborative to be in half-empty offices when most of my colleagues work in other offices and I’m still doing all of my meetings every day on zoom with folks in a bunch of different offices in different time zones, many of whom we hired in India to save costs?But… managers can’t function without underlings!
As a manager, this is true. I can't function without the excellent people who report to me, they're super smart folks. I sure as shit don't care where they're located though, they can do their work just as well without being in the same building as me.But… managers can’t function without underlings!
A 50% meh rate suggests that this isn't seen as a downside.Alternatively, by classifying themselves as remote, workers agree they can no longer be promoted or hired into new roles within the company.
Yeah, so the owner thought they owned you, that as their property you should have asked them permission to move. That in itself tells me you were worlds better off working for someone else.hasnt it been shown that companies are doing this to force workers to quit? That way they don't have to pay severence.
Though I think alot of it is because management litearlly isn't thinking and wants to justify their existance. I left a job that told me to come back - after I'd moved away. I told them office was now to far and response was that I should've asked permission to move. Needless to say I had an exist interview shortly later. Yet surprisingly the owner continued to gaslight me for "forcing them" into that situation.
Many interviewed admitted they were looking for work at other companies that aren't trying to corral employees back into the office.
You are perfect! More managers need to think like you! Sadly, most don't.As a manager, this is true. I can't function without the excellent people who report to me, they're super smart folks. I sure as shit don't care where they're located though, they can do their work just as well without being in the same building as me.
Right?! My last job kept renting this enormous amount off office space which was completely empty. A few managers showed up once a week to play house or something, but thats it. Imagine not paying for all that office space and just you know... keeping the money?Tell me you spent or currently spend WAY too much money on your overblown office building.... without telling me you now have a hunk of steel and glass that nobody wants. Cities need to get rid of the building bloat and have more greenspace. Good employees don't need to be "on-site" to be productive. I'm more productive off-site and still available for random questions on MS Teams.
I've always been told that corporations are ruthlessly efficient when it comes to costs and that's why we have to swallow the massive layoffs when companies are profitable but miss growth targets. Like, the world is handing you all millions (or even billions) in rent expense to improve your bottom line and the response is "no, it's the children who are wrong." All you have to do is think more than six months ahead!Just give it up people, fighting technological change is a good way to ruin yourselves. Embrace the massive eventual cost reduction of getting rid of all those offices now, instead of being forced to by inches over the next decade when you've paid millions to maintain almost empty offices and driven away all your best staff.
Nah. It does allow middle managers to interrupt their employees more easily thoughExecutive management at the companies trying to restore in-person work culture claim that working together in a physical space allows for greater collaboration and innovation.
Or customerWell, I am glad that I never had to deal with this as I retired decades ago. But then in my business (dentistry) it was never and could never be an issue - it is all hands on whether employee or employer...
the problem is the incestuous network of board memberships. Its all the same people, and lots of them are heavily invested in commercial real estate. its like when a shrimp company bought red lobster. red lobster was forced to buy a huge surplus of shrimp from them, and ultimately went bankrupt paying the crustacean bill. (there was some fuckery with commercial real estate as well)Just give it up people, fighting technological change is a good way to ruin yourselves. Embrace the massive eventual cost reduction of getting rid of all those offices now, instead of being forced to by inches over the next decade when you've paid millions to maintain almost empty offices and driven away all your best staff.
a working study at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research suggested around a 10 percent drop in productivity, even as it noted that the cost-saving benefits of remote work could make up for some of that.
Most are petty assholes who aren't all different from the people looking to become police. They think of themselves as "The Boss" rather than the leader of a department who is primarily responsible for their work.You are perfect! More managers need to think like you! Sadly, most don't.
One person said they'd spoken with colleagues who had chosen to go hybrid, and those colleagues reported doing work in mostly empty offices punctuated with video calls with people who were in other mostly empty offices.
The supposed magical efficiency of corporation is a lie we’re fed by people with vested interest in increasing corporations’ power and their useful idiots. It’s just as dogmatic a position as “government is always better”.I've always been told that corporations are ruthlessly efficient when it comes to costs and that's why we have to swallow the massive layoffs when companies are profitable but miss growth targets.
Turns out it is and always has been mostly about control. It seems like all of the pretense to suggest otherwise (just focused on profits!) has been completely abandoned in the last 10 years and seems to be rapidly accelerating.
Elon found a solution to that…It's probably more that they have these expensive office building that they have leases on them.
Naw, your looking at the symptoms, not the cause. They bought red lobster intending to extract all possible money from it then throw it away. Buying shrimp and forcing them to rent their own property (after selling it to holding company for free) was just ways to draining all money from the company, leaving it in bankruptcy and walking away.the problem is the incestuous network of board memberships. Its all the same people, and lots of them are heavily invested in commercial real estate. its like when a shrimp company bought red lobster. red lobster was forced to buy a huge surplus of shrimp from them, and ultimately went bankrupt paying the crustacean bill. (there was some fuckery with commercial real estate as well)
I'm a corporate controller and former financial auditor... I know where most, if not all of the bodies are buried.The supposed magical efficiency of corporation is a lie we’re fed by people with vested interest in increasing corporations’ power and their useful idiots. It’s just as dogmatic a position as “government is always better”.